Only two weeks after BP began capping the Deepwater Horizon oil rig blowout, people have begun to ask, “Where’s the oil?” The fact that skimmer ships sent out to clean the water of oil are unable to find oil to clean is leading the mainstream media to question whether environmentalists tried to exploit this unfortunate event by making it seem worse than it really was for political reasons.
Energy & Environment
Two man-made disasters have hit the Gulf Coast: the BP oil spill and the president’s moratorium on energy production. A third disaster is scheduled for a vote in the House today.
Two hundred twenty-six days before the Deepwater Horizon rig collapsed, the Consolidated Land, Energy, and Aquatic Resources (CLEAR) Act was introduced in the House. A repackaged version is now being sold as a response to the BP oil spill.
This bill has much less to do with preventing another spill than it does preventing domestic energy production and destroying jobs.
In his July 27 blog posting “The economics of U.S. ethanol policy” Professor Bruce Babcock of Iowa State University reports the results of new research suggesting that allowing the current 45-cent-per-gallon ethanol blender’s tax credit (Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit, or VEETC) and 54-cent-per-gallon ethanol tariff to expire on Dec. 31, 2010 would have little or no adverse impact on the domestic ethanol industry.
That’s true only if you take a “Field of Dreams” view of the ethanol industry: If we mandate that Americans use more ethanol, then someone, somewhere will produce that ethanol.
They are cultural icons as symbols of strength, agility, speed and grace. They hold special places in music, art, theater and film. Phrases that Americans use every day illustrate their ubiquity; we know what people mean when something is described as 'fast as a cheetah,' 'proud as a lion' or 'hungry as a wolf.' They are regarded as important touchstones in this country despite the fact that many Americans have never seen one of them in the wild.
Yet many species of wild cats and canids remain perilously close to extinction.
With the economy still not creating nearly enough jobs, U.S. ethanol producers are warning that ending the government subsidies and import restrictions that benefit their industry could eliminate some 112,000 to 160,000 jobs.
An unlikely collection of environmentalists, taxpayer groups and meat producers, meanwhile, argue that America no longer needs and can’t afford the current policies.
We can cut the deficit and help the environment at the same time. The two biggest challenges facing Congress right now are not mutually exclusive; we can do both. How? By cutting subsidies to industries that don’t need them and only encourage environmental damage. By updating our energy and farming policies to reflect the realities of today’s economy. And by stopping just some of the infrastructure projects members of Congress insert into spending bills as political pork. This is the message of a recent Green Scissors report by Environment America, Friends of the Earth, Public Citizen and Taxpayers for Common Sense and released with Reps. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), Mike Castle (R-Del.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and Tom Petri (R-Wis.).
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) made the following remarks at a media availability today following a Senate Democratic Caucus meeting to discuss energy legislation in the Senate. Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery:
We have a responsibility — both to our constituents and our children — to take on America’s energy challenge. Many of us want to do that through a comprehensive bill that creates jobs, breaks our addiction to oil and curbs pollution. Unfortunately, at this time not one Republican wants to join us in achieving this goal. That isn’t just disappointing. It’s dangerous.
And the damage is not limited just to oil rigs; it would also hurt the thousands of workers employed in industries that support drilling and exploration, and the millions of dollars in lost revenues from taxes and lease sales directed to coastal restoration would eventually affect every Gulf Coast resident.
Forty years ago, at the time of the first Earth Day, Americans became deeply worried about air and water pollution and a population explosion that threatened to overrun the planet’s resources. Nuclear power was seen as a savior to these environmental dilemmas. It could produce large amounts of low-cost, reliable clean energy. Unlike oil, nuclear power did not need to be hauled in leaking tankers from countries that didn’t like us. Unlike coal, it didn’t spew tons of pollution out of smokestacks.
The oily sludge staining Florida’s previously pristine beaches is a clear sign of failure. It is failure by the oil industry to safely manage its privilege to extract a natural resource, and it is failure by the White House and the Administration to respond with the leadership and sense of urgency this crisis demands.
The first failure belongs to BP and its partners. Drilling without the clear knowledge they could kill a well in a worst-case scenario was irresponsible and a failure of good judgment. Their missteps cost lives and now affect the environments and economies of five states. They are responsible for every loss associated with this disaster and should pay claims as quickly as possible.