THE HILL
 
comment
Print

We need to clarify why we're in Afghanistan

By Caroline Wadhams - 06/24/11 02:33 PM ET

President Barack Obama’s speech on Afghanistan earlier this week moved U.S. policy in the right direction through its emphasis on placing more responsibility in Afghan hands and prioritizing a political settlement that includes the Taliban. But it struggled to clarify an implementation plan for achieving U.S. objectives. The transition plan between July 2011 and 2014, when security is handed over to Afghans, continues as two bookends with no content in between, leaving one to wonder whether the plan is to hold our breath until 2014, and hope for the best. 
 
The challenge now is to fill in the detail behind the President’s strategic direction and to put in place the plans, metrics, benchmarks and programs to aggressively pursue a political settlement and to hand this over to Afghans. Currently, there is no detail in all lines of effort between now and 2014.  Basic questions, such as what is the military priority for U.S. and NATO forces in this intervening period – training Afghan forces, targeting Taliban leaders, or protecting civilian populations from attack - and how the military mission aligns with the larger goal, remain unanswered. 

On the political side, there is even less clarity. If the United States is going to leave behind a state that does not implode, an intensive political process must occur that addresses the fact that the Afghan government is in a state of crisis. Absent that process, the Afghan government is unlikely to survive a dramatic reduction in military and financial support from the international community upon which it depends.
 
At the moment, the processes to create opportunities for greater Afghan buy-in to a political settlement with the current government are still poorly defined. Some outreach efforts to the Taliban have reportedly begun, but their desire to participate in the current narrow and highly centralized Afghan political system is unclear. Meanwhile, the parliament — the one body that has served as a potential domestic check on the executive and a means of bringing opposition voices into government — is under attack as a special electoral court appointed by President Karzai has announced that nearly a quarter of the winners of last fall's highly contested election were invalid. 
 
In 2014, there will be an Afghan presidential election in which President Karzai will hand over the presidency to a successor as required by the Afghan Constitution. Despite the fact that the last two elections have been marred by fraud and abuse, there is no plan in place to undertake significant electoral reform to ensure that the next election does not ignite more conflict.  
 
The prospect of extending continued support to the Afghan government beyond 2014 through the negotiation of a strategic partnership agreement offers potential leverage for the U.S. to press the Karzai administration for greater action now, but only if we identify the necessary steps for political reform between now and 2014 that can make transition a reality.
 
President Obama set a direction for U.S. policy this week, but many steps are still required to achieve its goals. It is the responsibility of Congress to carry out its oversight role in the coming weeks and months through both legislation and hearings in order to push the Obama administration to provide clarity on the content for transition in all lines of effort, especially on the political side.  Without that planning, we risk finding ourselves in 2014, with either transition delayed, or a breakdown in the state.

Caroline Wadhams is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, where she focuses on Afghanistan, Pakistan, terrorism issues and U.S. national security. Prior to CAP, she served as a legislative assistant on foreign policy issues for former Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.). Wadhams also worked at the Council on Foreign Relations in New York and Washington, D.C. She served as a U.S. election observer in Afghanistan's parliamentary elections in September 2010 and Pakistan's parliamentary elections in February 2008.


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/foreign-policy/168401-we-need-to-clarify-why-were-in-afghanistan

More Videos »

Congress Blog Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.