

Meningitis outbreak should guide FDA action on biosimilars
Last Thursday, the Senate HELP Committee gathered to review the implications of the recent fungal meningitis outbreak that led to 33 deaths and over 450 cases of serious illnesses in 19 states because a failure at both the state and federal levels to enforce current laws and regulations to keep patients safe. A complete picture of how this disaster occurred and what lawmakers will do to prevent future failures remains to be seen.
As a healthcare provider, with experience as the head of the Patient Quality Assurance Committee at hospitals I have worked, I am deeply saddened by this avoidable tragedy. Our government must do a better job of ensuring the safe supply of our medicines. It is not enough to provide the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with greater authority to monitor pharmacies and crack down on companies with safety violations as FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg requested; we need a better system of adverse event reporting. To this end, lawmakers must not only consider small drug compounders, but also large-molecule medicines.
Because of their volatility, and the need for the public health system to be able to identify and respond to manufacturing errors – like tainted steroid injections that led to the meningitis outbreak – a comprehensive track and trace system must be in place for biosimilars.
On its website the FDA advises that adverse events related to biologics be reported via the FDA’s MedWatch program or contact the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for vaccines. However, with many biological medicines coming off-patent in the following years and being copied by generic drug companies, additional measures must be included. There are also currently no procedures in place to distinguish between a biologic medicine and its biosimilar(s), which are similar but never identical. And with biologics and biosimilars, adverse reactions from these products are often seen only weeks or months later, complicating tracking and tracing measures.
To protect patients, the FDA should require unique product names, labels and product codes, as well as a system to distinguish between a biologic and its biosimilar(s) and track and trace all products. This is very important because according to a recent survey conducted by the Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicines (ASBM), “the vast majority (99%) of physicians refer to biological medicines by name for both recording in charts and for reporting adverse events...”
Additionally, and very importantly, doctors and their patients should decide what biologic medicine a patient receives, and this decision can never be overridden by a pharmacist or insurance company. Eighty-five percent of responding physicians to the ASBM survey support this position. Finally, the FDA must ensure that robust clinical testing is performed on all biologic and biosimilar medicines to guarantee the same safety, purity, and potency. If not properly regulated, patients could be placed in unnecessary danger. The silver lining of the Senate HELP hearing is that we still have time to protect patients against future adverse events.
Petersen is currently director of the Breast Surgery Clinic of St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx, New York and adjunct associate professor of Surgery at New York University School of Medicine.








Most Viewed RSS Feed »
