If the president does not nominate individuals to serve on the IPAB — or if the IPAB fails to recommend cuts — the law gives the Secretary of Health and Human Services the power to make changes unilaterally. We all should be able to agree that the power to affect seniors’ health care should not be concentrated in one person.
Supporters of the board like to claim that IPAB is prevented from rationing care, and as far as the language of the law reads, that’s true. But dig a little deeper and you find out what’s prevented depends on how you define the word “rationing.” The IPAB is not allowed to say that a person should be denied a particular treatment or type of care, but the IPAB is allowed to cut payments to the physicians that perform these treatments low enough that the effect is no physician is willing to provide the treatment. In my view, the board is rationing care if the effect of their decisions is reduced access to needed care.
As a physician with more than 30 years of experience, I find the ability of this board to intervene in the patient-doctor relationship particularly troubling. Because of these concerns, today I reintroduced the Protecting Seniors’ Access to Medicare Act, my legislation to repeal the IPAB. This bipartisan bill passed the House last Congress and had the support of members on both sides of the aisle. This Congress, the bill was introduced with over 80 cosponsors, including five democrats. I believe my bill is a testament to the fact that members of Congress can put party politics aside, come together and do what’s right for our seniors. I will continue to push for a full repeal of the IPAB, and I look forward to working with my colleagues — both Republicans and Democrats — to protect and preserve Medicare.
Roe is a member of the House Education and Workforce Committee.