THE HILL
 

Countdown to healthcare: Crossing the finish line on the public option (Rep. Anthony Weiner)

By Rep. Anthony Weiner (D-N.Y.) - 11/05/09 09:55 AM ET

In just a few short weeks, the public option has moved from afterthought to center stage. This happened because the American people made their voices heard and overwhelmed the insurance companies and special interests.

And although we're close to the finish line on health care, now is not the time to relent. There are still those who oppose a public option and will stand in the way of once-in-a-lifetime reform. The prelude is over. The real battle has begun.

Those who support the public option will prevail, but only if we follow the formula that got us here.

Left for dead a few weeks ago, there are four reasons why the public option will survive this intense fight, despite millions of dollars in insurance industry money pushing in the opposite direction.

First, we gave the American people direct access to Congress. Though polls have consistently shown that a majority of Americans support the public option, Members of Congress from both sides of the aisle treated the issue as a marginal part of the debate.

We were able to use the Internet to cut through the Washington apathy and reach the millions of Americans who support a public option. My site alone (www.CountdowntoHealthCare.com) amassed over 60,000 signatures for the public option. Hundreds of thousands more have joined Facebook groups or Twitter campaigns dedicated to a real public health care option
Using the Internet, those of us fighting for a public option were able to create a direct conduit to the halls of Congress. We opened up the process beyond the usual crowd of lobbyists and special interests, and turned an experiment in open government into results. We showed that a vocal minority with deep pockets can't overwhelm the will of the people.

Second, because we were able to make this debate truly public, it became about merits rather than insider politics. And when that happened, my Democratic colleagues recognized that the public option is the only solution to the main problem with our nation's health care system: costs.

We pay too much for health care, and, as a result, millions of Americans either can't choose the quality coverage they want, or can't afford health care at all. Millions more simply pay higher premiums each year, slowly eroding their financial stability.

The only way we can truly contain these skyrocketing costs is by providing real competition to an industry starved of it. A public option, with less overhead and free of the profit motive that plagues insurance companies, could do this.

Despite the merits of the argument and despite the public outcry, the minority opposing the public option has been loud and well-financed. A healthy dose of misinformation hasn't hurt, either.

But I commend my colleagues in the House and Senate who, undeterred, worked to deliver a public option to the American people. Speaker Pelosi never wavered, and insisted on the importance of a strong public option, even when she worried that she might not have the votes from some of my Democratic friends.

In the Senate, it took some creativity and determination, but they got it done. My predecessor in the House, Senator Chuck Schumer, first proposed the idea of an opt-out public option a few weeks ago, which would allow states to leave the program by 2014. It's an intriguing proposal, and one that I believe has real promise if we give the public option a chance to get up and running before governors can choose to pull the plug.

Despite the fact an Independent, a Republican and two Democratic Senators have reservations about a public option, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has refused to let the minority trample over the demands of an entire nation. He embraced the opt-out proposal as a central feature of the bill he plans to bring to the Senate floor.

Third, we used our majority the right way. Last year, Americans sent a clear signal when they gave Democrats a majority in order to deliver a "change" agenda. Health care is at the top of that list. Americans have suffered for too long under the burden of endlessly rising health care costs. Our job was to rise above the back and forth of politics and come up with a plan that could contain those costs.

That's what a majority is supposed to do.

Now we need a fourth and final element: the President. Back on September 9th, President Obama said he supported a public option, but insisted it was only one means to an end, and asked us to keep an open mind.

Now we need the president to stand up again and help push the public option past the finish line. Only he can provide the momentum we need to pass a bill. No voice is louder, no appeal more inspiring.

We're on the cusp of health care reform that includes a public option. This is further than the skeptics ever thought we would be, but there is still work to be done.

An unprecedented grassroots movement in favor of the public option, amplified by the Internet, has changed the nature of our political debate. But I worry that Congress may revert to old habits of political rhetoric and distraction.

We also know that the minority opposition will not rest until the President signs a bill. Senator Joseph Lieberman, an Independent, has said that he would filibuster the bill with Republicans. If the forces of obstruction will not rest, then neither can we.

Americans who want quality, affordable health care need to make their support for a public option heard. With their voices and, hopefully, one last nudge from the president, we have a chance to turn a long awaited dream into a reality.

Cross-posted from The Huffington Post.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/66491-countdown-to-healthcare-crossing-the-finish-line-on-the-public-option-rep-anthony-weiner

Comments (15)

Thank you for everything you are trying to do for us and for your diligent, honest leadership on this crucial issue.BY Jane on 11/05/2009 at 11:27
Wow, well written article but you do not understand the issues, even the physician/politicians (your peers) are opposed to this. As a physician and surgeon, a public option will be full of overhead, waits and limits to care. Look at medicare right now, a government run program. Full of more overhead than private insurance and constant rejections of care. Why are 19 physician sub-specialty groups opposed to it? What percentage of practicing M.D's are part of the AMA?(not many). Please do not limit access by forcing physicians to not accept your public option. Look at how many MD's are opting out of medicare? Look at both sides and do not force this through without thinking over what is at stake.BY Brett on 11/05/2009 at 12:00
Rep. Weiner, How anyone who has the best interests of the American people at heart can support this travesty of a Health Care Reform Bill is beyond comprehension. fyi, Seniors, the Middle Class, Businesses, Young Folks, Physicians will all be screwed by this bill.Below is a summary of what is contained in the House Health Care Reform Bill:Total cost: $1. 7 trillion (contrary to what Nancy Pelosi stated)New Taxes: $800 billionCuts to Medicare: $426 billionNot included: $247 billion needed to stop Medicare payments to doctors from decreasing, pledged to be passed in a separate bill to keep this bill “revenue neutral”Pages: 1,990 PLUSThe word regulation appears in the bill 181 times.The word fees appears in the bill 103 times.The word tax appears in the bill 214 times.The word “shall” - as in “must” or “required to” - appears over 3,000 times.110 new boards, bureaucracies, commissions, and programsThe House Bill eviscerates Medicare breaking every promise politicians made to Seniors. So when government takes over the rest of Health Care expect government to break all of the promises Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and President Obama has made to the American people.Pelosi, Reid and Obama promised:— Lower costs, INSTEAD EXPECT HIGHER COSTS— Higher quality, INSTEAD EXPECT LOWER QUALITY,— More Choice, INSTEAD EXPECT LESS CHOICE— More competition, INSTEAD EXPECT LESS COMPETITION AND THE DEAD HAND OF GOVERNMENT CONTROL OVER EVERY ASPECT OF HEALTH CAREBottom line, it is impossible to provide higher quality health care for 30 million more people and at the same time lower costs. The reality is the opposite will happen and anyone who says otherwise is a liar.The House Bill is an abomination of higher taxes and fees, devastating cuts to Medicare, onerous regulations and massive new bureaucracies that will destroy jobs, kill the economy, squash innovation, lower quality, increase costs and again, make massive cuts to Medicare which will hasten its certain bankruptcy.VOTE NO ON THIS MOST HORRIBLE BILL IN THE HISTORY OF THE US OR BE VOTED OUT OF OFFICE.BY Mary on 11/05/2009 at 18:03
Please keep fighting for the people who need HEALTHCARE, everybody I have talk with that are against this healthcare bill, have good government ins. their self, but don't want everybody to have it, they don't understand what it's like to be without ins. and don't care!! If the money for this unwinable war for the last 8 yrs.was put on this healthcare bill, it would be PAID IN FULL for the next 10 yrs. VOTE YES FOR THE HEALTHCARE BILL, our President was voted in on this promise, if this is not past I will vote against everybody who does not vote yes on this Health care Bill.BY Diane on 11/05/2009 at 20:12
I have given many, many times to the democratic party during the last two years. Starting now, I refuse to give another dime to the party with several so called democrats (bought and sold by the insurance companies) who are not for the good of our neighbors. We put this party in power to listen to and give all the people the basic needs for all human beings. Please see that we unite like the other side is doing and we know what happen with them in control the last 8 years.DaveBY Dave on 11/05/2009 at 20:33
But, do we need Senator Joseph Lieberman? Can we trade him in for someone human?BY Todd on 11/05/2009 at 22:13
It is just a matter of trust! Do I trust the government?Well lets see ( I do not know of any government program that has ever come in with in budget! Perhaps our leaders should realize trust is not given.Now they say trust us? Why should I trust! First they should clean up there own act. Then perhaps I might support public health care!BY emil Lobosco on 11/06/2009 at 00:28
When I need fast, good service I go to FedEx or UPS…not the US postal service. To Diane - we need coverage and reform. This is covering more of the same. We need physicians and surgeons to not order tests for fear of lawsuits (I did it 3 times today!!!) Are politicians (most lawyers) who are funded by trail lawyers going to look at Tort reform? Likely not. Do you trust that the government entities to look out for you? Or do you trust you and your doctor to look after you. 19 Physician subspecialty groups have said no to this bill. I do not know of any physicians that belong to the AMA. Why are neuro, OB, Uro, general and ortho surgeons against this…IT WILL LIMIT COVERAGE!!! Physicians will not accept US government coverage!!BY Brett on 11/06/2009 at 11:53
The people who think that the House Health Care Reform Bill will provide them with good health care are living in a dream land. They may get coverage, but with fewer physicians available to provide the care and 110 new govt. agencies overseeing who gets what care if any, good luck with getting any health care. Than there is the taxes on small businesses who will avoid expanding their businesses and hiring more people in order to avoid the higher taxes in the House Bill. If the the House Bill passes, we may all think that the current 10% unemployment rate is not so bad. Than there are the Seniors whose Medicare coverage will be cut by 500 billion dollars. Saying that the money will be saved by "streamlining" the system and making it more inefficient is pure fiction. Everyone knows that such enormous cuts to Medicare will cripple the system and greatly hasten its bankruptcy. The House Bill should be renamed the Kill off Granny, Small businesses and Jobs Bill because everything in the House Bill is designed to do just that.BY Gary on 11/06/2009 at 16:13
Rep. Weiner, just saw you on MSNBC. Good job on using the "teabagger" word again. Do you kiss your wife with that mouth? How mature for a congressman!I also looked at your website "countowntohealt hcare" and did not sign up for that. What a lazy way to take action.BTW- the people who went to DC paid their own way just like I did on 09/11/09. I think there were 53 of us there (LOL).I am sure you can get my email from this submission, please feel free to contact me regarding this.BY Michael on 11/06/2009 at 21:44

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.