THE HILL
 

NYC women unite against Stupak-Pitts Amendment (Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand)

By Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) - 11/18/09 12:32 PM ET

Yesterday, I was proud to share the stage with several of New York City's top women leaders to speak out against the House health care bill's Stupak-Pitts amendment. It was incredibly inspiring to be joined by such women as Rep. Carolyn Maloney, Gloria Steinem, Speaker of the NY City Council, Christine Quinn, President of Planned Parenthood, Cecile Richards, President of NARAL Pro-Choice NY, Kelli Conlin, and many others as we spoke with one voice against a measure that is surely the greatest attempt to roll back women's reproductive rights since Roe V Wade was decided in 1973.

While the passage of The Affordable Health Care for America Act through the House was a milestone worth celebrating, the Stupak-Pitts amendment attached to it is truly dangerous to women and girls. This measure goes beyond current law and limits womens' ability to purchase abortion coverage with their own money, disproportionately affecting low income women who are most likely to seek coverage through the exchange. It is simply an outrageous measure and I am committed to ensuring that any similar language is defeated in the Senate and is stripped from the final bill in conference.


I hope you will join with us to oppose Stupak-Pitts by making your voice heard. Please blog about this, tweet about it (you can follow me at @SenGillibrand) and e-mail all your friends and family about the importance of defeating this dangerous amendment.

For more on why I believe Stupak-Pitts must be defeated, below is video and the text of my remarks from yesterday's event.

Thanks for your continued advocacy.

Please sign EMILY's List's Stop Stupak Petition!

Cross-posted from The Huffington Post.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/healthcare/68371-nyc-women-unite-against-stupak-pitts-amendment-sen-kirsten-gillibrand

Comments (4)

Where is it written that I must help pay for the murder of a baby in the womb? I'm all for a woman's right to choose, but it is pure unadultrated b.s. that taxpayers should have to foot the bill. Personally, I hope Stupak's amendment prevails if this lousy health care reform bill goes throughBY Phil on 11/18/2009 at 14:34
Phil…the same place it's written that my tax dollars may go to fund war, which I oppose on religious grounds. Or that any one person or groups tax dollars may go to fund something they find intolerable or whatever.That dog hasn't hunted for years…BY Candy on 11/18/2009 at 17:20
The majority of the people in the U.S. do not want the federal government to pay for abortions. Your dumb liberals keep voting crooks into office like Frank, Rangel. Dodd, Murtha, Feinstein, Boxer, Waters and others and then they are going to rob the people while getting there retirement of $150,000 or more. That is why we need term limits one term of four years no grandfather clause served 4 years and your out. No retirment except for social security, no grandfather clause and no free health care. If a crook gets voted in there out in four not like the above in for twenty years and becoming millionares on the tax payers of this country. Yea the dems are after private industry they a paupers to what the politicians have done to this country 13 trillion in debt and they pass a bill to give themselves a raise. What a travisty!BY William on 11/18/2009 at 21:53
Hi, women of the world who want the choice of murder. How many choices are you allowed to make prior to becoming impregnated? Probably at least 30 "Choices" are considered prior to conception. Should I go on the date, should I go to the party, should I wear this revealing outfit or this conservative outfit? Should I drink alcohol or not? Should I go up to his condo or not? Should I make him wear a condom, which is 90ish% effective in preventing pregnancy? The answer is : it doesnt matter. NO MATTER WHAT DECISION I MAKE, DEMOCRATS IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE WILL HELP ME KILL ANY BABY I DON'T WANT. Those Democrats are great, they don't support waterboarding KSM but they support a woman's right to stick a spike into an 8 and a half month old VIABLE fetus for the purpose of murdering it. Makes a lot of sense…BY Dan on 11/23/2009 at 13:15

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.