THE HILL
 

Guantanamo Bay closure is ill-advised policy (Rep. Charlie Dent)

By Rep. Charlie Dent (R-Pa.) - 10/16/09 10:25 AM ET

Ever since January, when President Obama announced his decision to close the Guantanamo Bay Terrorist Detention Center, I have been vocal in my concerns about a potential plan to transfer or release detainees to the United States. As a Member of the House Committee on Homeland Security, this strikes me as ill-advised.

The prisoners we are talking about are people like Khalid Sheikh Mohamed, admitted mastermind of the 9/11 attacks – dangerous killers who do not know the bounds of decency or law. They are not ordinary criminals; they are declared enemies of the United States who were engaging in direct action against us.

In March, the President acknowledged the difficulty in determining the level of danger posed by certain prisoners. To that end, I expected the Administration’s assurance that they have a plan to keep such truly dangerous people from threatening the security of our communities and overall national security if and when these detainees reach the United States. But a plan isn’t forthcoming.

In May, I pressed Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano for answers regarding the transfer and perhaps even release of the Guantanamo Bay detainees. Secretary Napolitano indicated that she would work toward holding classified briefing in the future, but one has yet to be scheduled.

Just yesterday, I spoke with Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security Jane Lute about the risks associated with transferring or releasing terrorists into the United States given the Department’s acknowledged concern about sleeper cells within our country. I still have not received specifics.

Since February, many of my fellow Committee members have requested Chairman Bennie Thompson grant us permission to visit Guantanamo Bay on a bipartisan Committee delegation to observe the facility for ourselves. The Defense Department has granted us permission to go – but the Majority has not.

For now, I remain convinced that Guantanamo Bay is better suited to hold these detainees than any facility, even a military base, in the United States. We’ve invested hundreds of millions of dollars to add facilities at Guantanamo Bay specifically to handle these detainees. It’s surrounded by minefields and protected by the best security force in the world, the United States Marine Corps.

I, for one, sleep well at night knowing that these dangerous terrorists are detained at Guantanamo Bay instead of somewhere in the United States.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/homeland-security/63459-guantanamo-bay-closure-is-ill-advised-policy-rep-charlie-dent

Comments (9)

WRONG!!! Guantanamo is nothing more than a recruiting poster for those who seek to harm us. And, by the way, Bush favored closure BEFORE President Obama took office!BY Greg Williams on 10/16/2009 at 12:11
It is wasteful to close Gitmo, as we've spent "hundreds of millions of dollars to add facilities" there, as Rep. Dent says. Why not merely address the real problem at Gitmo, which is torture? End the torture, problem solved. If torture has already ended, as some allege, let's publicly verify that, and then Gitmo will no longer be a "recruiting poster for those who seek to harm us," as Greg Williams commented.To close Gitmo merely as a symbolic gesture is an even more profligate waste of money.BY James Hill on 10/16/2009 at 16:28
Put them on trial or send them home. Has anyone even studied the history behind why the US owns Gitmo?And vote for Jake Towne instead of Dent! TowneForCongres s.comBY Dent Constitutent on 10/16/2009 at 20:27
If they are criminals and there is actual evidence that they are (surely there must be after all this time?) then put them on trial and produce the evidence. The best way to defend civilization is to uphold it, The best way to promote the rule of law is to apply the law. The moment you abandon the rule of law, justice and codes of civilized conduct, the terrorists have won because the strategy of terrorism is to get the state to do just that. And you have abandoned the very things you sought to defend!BY steve on 10/17/2009 at 08:43
What if they are indeed totured? Does it bring back the lives lost? These men acted without considering those same codes human rights. Why should they be considered after all?BY Gem meg on 10/17/2009 at 16:43
If you believe the jihadi propaganda that Gitmo is a recruiting poster, then wait until all those terrorists are locked up in the US…the recruiting propaganda by jihadis and sympathisers inside the US will make that look like a hand drawn sign…Of course Williams is just spouting leftist talking points…like Islamic terrorists are a tiny minority…well if they are just a tiny minority then why would anyone worry about possible recruitment over Gitmo? Doing so admits to the fact that a large portion of the primarily very young Muslim population is prone to supporting and possibly being easily swayed to join the jihad…again, if that's not true then worrying about recruitment is a moot point. If majority of Muslims are peaceful and reject terrorism then have faith in your belief as such…you can't have it both ways.BY Rea L. Ist on 10/17/2009 at 18:23
Although these people may have not considered the same codes of human rights which we live by, they are still humans. If they are indeed tortured in Gitmo then I feel strongly about the decission to close its gates for good. We are Americans, and as such were formed by the concept of "unalienable rights." A concept which we have lived by for hundreds of years. So by taking away thier rights, we are going against the very code of conduct at which we, as free Americans came to exist. You say these people failed to to take into consideration the natural rights of the people they killed, and I agree with you; However this dose not necessarily mean that we should do the same. By taking their natural rights away what do we become? If not terrorists, then what?BY N-A-T-U-R-A-L RIGHTS on 10/18/2009 at 13:24
These remaining terorists arnt in their because they stole an candy bar from the American Citizens, they are in their for respected reasons. Khalid Sheikh Mohamed was the mastermind behind the killings of thousands of inncents individuals, yet, the intense interrogation tactics that have been used seem to be too 'inhumane' for our society. you guys are pathetic. These terrorists have done terrible things and now we want to send them to there own town jail where there is an escape rate 27 percent higher in a third country than the US, and if we do have them imprisoned in the US how will our kids sleep at night and parents sleep at night knowing that the ones who are involved in killing sisters brothers and parents are down the street in a prison, Think about the riots that could happen, or better yet think about the factor if Al-qaeda wants these guys free.. its way easier to get into America than it is for Cuba especially with those mind feilds. It is a major mistake in even thinking about closing Guantanamo Bay, yes there is a few underlying issues that can be quickly responded to, but President Obama is an idiot bringing threats on our own soil and we all know it.BY Clay on 10/18/2009 at 17:36
this is all crazy obama did the right thing by closing down guantanamo bay…if these guys are terrorist then just put them on trial and bring out the evidence …if there is any and by torturing them americans are just acting like terrorists themselvesBY me on 10/18/2009 at 23:57

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.