Obama has moved cooperatively to rapidly fill openings by decreasing the charges, gamesmanship and paybacks which have troubled appointments. He maximized consultation by soliciting guidance from Democratic and Republican senators prior to official nominations. For instances, following carefully sought advice from Arizona Republican Senators John McCainJohn McCainCheney: Russian election interference could be ‘act of war’ Grassley wants details on firm tied to controversial Trump dossier Republicans giving Univision the cold shoulder: report MORE and Jon Kyl, Obama nominated District Judge Mary Murguia, who captured unanimous 2010 appointment. In 2011, he again consulted the senators, who strongly recommended Hurwitz.
Once the president chose nominees of balanced temperament, who are smart, ethical, independent and hardworking, he cooperated with Democrats and Republicans. However, the floor is the bottleneck. GOP members have incessantly rejected votes, even for nominees who have powerful home-state senator backing and would fill emergencies. The Senate required Nguyen to wait five months and Christen three after both received unanimous committee votes, confirming Nguyen 91-3 and Christen 95-3.
Watford enjoyed a smooth December hearing and won February 10-6 committee approval. Because Republicans refused a floor vote, Democrats invoked cloture, which the GOP vitiated on the afternoon of the final vote. Some Republicans voiced concern regarding his involvement in challenges to capital punishment and Arizona’s controversial immigration legislation. Hurwitz received a January hearing and a March 13-5 committee vote. Should Republicans vitiate Democrats’ cloture petition on Hurwitz, members ought to approve him Monday because the nominee is a very experienced jurist and earned the best ABA rating. If Republicans insist on a cloture vote, senators should favor cloture and expeditiously confirm Hurwitz. Several GOP members appeared concerned about his law review article, which allegedly assumed credit for enunciating Roe v. Wade’s premise.
Even should the Senate confirm Hurwitz, the second opening may remain. Obama has proposed no nominee for Judge Stephen Trott’s seat, although he took senior status in 2004, mainly because Idaho GOP Senators Mike CrapoMike CrapoSenators war over Wall Street during hearing for Trump's SEC pick Overnight Finance: Biz groups endorse Trump's Labor pick | New CBO score coming before health bill vote | Lawmakers push back on public broadcasting cuts Senate Banking panel seeks proposals for economic growth MORE and James Risch have argued Trott’s decision to sit in Boise makes his seat an Idaho one. Accordingly, Obama must consult the California members because Trott filled a California opening and perhaps the Idaho senators, as they may resist a California nominee. Obama should then quickly propose a strong nominee.
President Obama and the Senate must rapidly fill the Ninth Circuit vacancies with superb judges, so the tribunal can deliver justice.
Tobias is the Williams Chair in Law, University of Richmond.