Obama has assiduously sought the guidance and support of Democrat and Republican elected officials before actual nominations and has tapped nominees of balanced temperament, who are intelligent, diligent, independent and ethical, as well as diverse vis-á-vis ethnicity, gender and ideology. Numerous observers criticized the administration for nominating too slowly in 2009, but the White House subsequently accelerated the pace. The courts ought to give thanks for Obama’s increased diligence when making nominations, as manifested by his nominating seven well qualified district court candidates last week.
The bench should thank Senator Patrick LeahyPatrick LeahySenate pressured to take up email privacy bill after overwhelming House vote House unanimously passes email privacy bill This week: Congress on track to miss Puerto Rico deadline MORE (D-Vt.), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Senator Charles GrassleyChuck GrassleyOvernight Defense: House panel approves 0B defense bill Carter pledges probe of sex assault testimony Grassley: Carter emails contained 'sensitive' information MORE (R-Iowa), the ranking member, for expediting panel consideration and Senator Henry Reid (D-Nev.), the majority leader, for attempting to cooperate closely with Republicans on confirming nominees. A signal of collegiality is that Leahy may hold only one more nomination hearing this year.
The federal judiciary and the 19 strong lower court nominees, most of whom the committee approved with no substantive opposition and have waited months for votes, should also be grateful that the Senate finally returned to Washington last week for a lame duck session. Moreover, the bench should be heartened by President Obama’s call for greater bipartisanship in that session and the Republican leadership’s apparent willingness to work effectively with Democrats to solve the country’s problems. One critical difficulty which bipartisanship can solve is the plethora of judicial vacancies that jeopardize the delivery of justice.
Despite the cooperative efforts to fill the many openings recounted above, the Senate could have approved a considerably larger number of judges, had some Republican members cooperated more fully with Democrats. Throughout most of the 112th Congress, GOP senators have slowed floor votes by placing holds on nominees, while Senator Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellIran and heavy water: Five things to know Overnight Finance: House rejects financial adviser rule; Obama rebukes Sanders on big banks Senators roll out changes to criminal justice bill MORE (R-Ky.), the minority leader, has cooperated less than he might by entering too few temporal agreements for nominee floor ballots. Indeed, after returning to Washington for three days, the Senate recessed last Thursday for the Thanksgiving holiday without considering any of the 19 well qualified nominees on the floor. Democrats and Republicans must cooperate more closely in confirming judges because the ten percent vacancy rate can erode courts’ efforts to swiftly, inexpensively and fairly resolve cases.
The federal judiciary, which has been operating without one in ten of its authorized active judgeships, apparently has much for which to be thankful this Thanksgiving. However, the promising signs will only materialize into judicial confirmations if Democrats and Republicans work cooperatively in the lame duck session and the 113th Senate for the good of the courts, Congress and the nation.
Tobias is the Williams Chair in Law at the University of Richmond.