Congress should not gut law providing 9/11 victims justice
© Getty Images

Just a few weeks ago, Sens. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamDurbin: I had 'nothing to do' with Curbelo snub Republicans jockey for position on immigration Overnight Health Care: House passes 20-week abortion ban | GOP gives ground over ObamaCare fix | Price exit sets off speculation over replacement MORE (R-S.C.) and John McCainJohn Sidney McCainRubio asks Army to kick out West Point grad with pro-communist posts The VA's woes cannot be pinned on any singular administration Overnight Defense: Mattis offers support for Iran deal | McCain blocks nominees over Afghanistan strategy | Trump, Tillerson spilt raises new questions about N. Korea policy MORE (R-Ariz.) introduced a bill to “fix” the law Congress recently passed over President Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaAll five living former presidents to attend hurricane relief concert Overnight Health Care: Schumer calls for tying ObamaCare fix to children's health insurance | Puerto Rico's water woes worsen | Dems plead for nursing home residents' right to sue Interior moves to delay Obama’s methane leak rule MORE's veto, called the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA). The bill, which passed with overwhelming majorities of both houses of Congress earlier this year, allows the families of the victims of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 to file lawsuits against those involved in the attacks.  The clear intent of the McCain-Graham “fix” bill is to gut a law that will aid victims of 9/11 to get their day in court.

This is a law that had the strong support of presidential candidate, now president-elect, Donald TrumpDonald John TrumpIvanka Trump pens op-ed on kindergartners learning tech Bharara, Yates tamp down expectations Mueller will bring criminal charges Overnight Cybersecurity: Equifax security employee left after breach | Lawmakers float bill to reform warrantless surveillance | Intel leaders keeping collusion probe open MORE who posted a statement from former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani on his campaign website on Sept. 28, 2016 that “President Obama’s veto of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act was an insult to the families of those we lost on 9/11 and I congratulate the Congress for righting that terrible wrong.” 

Giuliani went on to argue that “These family members are wonderful people who have gone through the unimaginable. They deserve the opportunity to seek justice and gain closure on this painful chapter in their lives. Now they will finally have the chance to do it.”  Trump supported the law as is and any changes to the law would prevent victims from gaining justice.

Sens. John CornynJohn CornynGun proposal picks up GOP support House bill set to reignite debate on warrantless surveillance Republicans jockey for position on immigration MORE (R-Texas) and Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerOvernight Health Care: Schumer calls for tying ObamaCare fix to children's health insurance | Puerto Rico's water woes worsen | Dems plead for nursing home residents' right to sue Crying on TV doesn't qualify Kimmel to set nation's gun agenda Trump knocks ‘fake’ news coverage of his trip to Puerto Rico MORE (D-N.Y.) sponsored the original version of JASTA and the Senate voted to override President Obama’s veto by a 97-1 vote.  Changing the bill with language that would delay victim’s day in court would essentially delay justice.  The so-called fix raises the bar on what the victims would have to prove and makes the law virtually unworkable.  On Dec. 9, 2016, Sen. Orrin HatchOrrin Grant HatchGOP eyes limits on investor tax break Children’s health-care bill faces new obstacles Overnight Finance: White House requests B for disaster relief | Ex-Equifax chief grilled over stock sales | House panel approves B for border wall | Tax plan puts swing-state Republicans in tough spot MORE (R-Utah) gave a speech on the Senate floor joining Graham and McCain’s effort to change the law.

On Sept. 11, 2001, nearly 3,000 Americans were killed that day, and more than 6,000 other injured, when 19 Islamic extremist terrorist hijacked four commercial airliners, flying two them into the twin towers of the World Trade Center, one into the Pentagon, and the fourth crashing in Pennsylvania. Of the 19 hijackers, 15 of them were citizens of Saudi Arabia. It is not a coincidence that Saudi Arabia is hiring a team of lobbyists to “fix” the JASTA bill.

Families of 9/11 victims have sought to bring lawsuits against Saudi Arabia, only to find the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) blocks such suits. This is why Congress passed JASTA, to not to overturn that act, but to simply allow a narrow exception to the law that allows the families to go forward with holding legally accountable, in civil court, those who were involved in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11.  Congress agreed that this was an extraordinary circumstance that mandated a day in court for victims to find out the truth.

Opponents of JASTA argue incorrectly that extract settlements from foreign nations to protect against disclosures of otherwise secret diplomatic and national security communications, because foreign nations already participate in litigation in U.S. Courts due to existing exceptions to sovereign immunity under FSIA, including matters on national security. The U.S. Supreme Court, in Republic of Argentina v. NML Capital Ltd. held unanimously that “settled doctrines of privilege” and principles of international comity protect foreign states from inappropriate incursions into their governmental documents in U.S. litigation proceedings. JASTA doesn't change any of these rules.

The legislation by Graham,  McCain and Hatch would effectively repeal JASTA. Instead, their effort to gut the legislation is being sold as a minor “fix” the bill, because it has such overwhelming support from the American people and the Trump administration.

Graham claims the “fix” will only allow foreign governments to be held accountable “if they knowingly engage with a terrorist organization directly or indirectly, including financing” of terrorist activities. Terry Strada, national chairman of a group representing the 9/11 victims called the proposed change a stab in the back.  Strada argued that “[Graham] and Sen. McCain are seeking to torpedo JASTA by imposing changes demanded by Saudi Arabia's lobbyists. We have reviewed the language, and it is an absolute betrayal.” Saudi Arabia has reportedly hired prominent lobbying firms to aide in their fight for weakening or repeal of JASTA since it was passed over President Obama's veto.

It is not a coincidence that Sens. McCain, Graham and Hatch waited until after election day to announce the new bill, because they understand that this would have created a firestorm against Republican at the ballot box.  Justice for the families of 9/11 is long overdue and more important than offending the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.  JASTA is a reasonable and measured effort to bring about that justice. McCain and Graham need to leave JASTA as is and work to support, not oppose, the America first effort by Cornyn and Schumer to give some measure of solace, and a day in court, for 9/11 victims.

Dean Chambers is an independent journalist and blogger whose articles have been featured on The Drudge Report and The Rush Limbaugh Program, as well as parodied by Stephen Colbert, Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow.

The views expressed by authors are their own and not the views of The Hill.