Time for law and order in Internet gambling

Internet gambling is here to stay. Delaware, Nevada and New Jersey recently legalized Internet gambling, while at least a dozen additional states are considering joining the action. There are also millions of Americans throughout the country who can and do participate in all forms of Internet gambling every day in an unregulated, uncontrolled environment ruled by offshore operators who ignore U.S. laws. The big question remaining unanswered is whether all forms of Internet gambling are going to be properly regulated at the federal level, or will we end up with a patchwork of inconsistent state laws that fail to protect every American.


FTC to shine a light on patent troll practices

One hundred years ago when Congress was considering establishing an agency for competition and consumer protection enforcement, one of the key authors of the Federal Trade Commission Act, Louis Brandeis wrote: “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.”


Essential role of private lawyers in defending the poor

On September 17, USA Today reported that “[t]he budget crunch took its latest toll on the federal judiciary … when money to pay court-appointed lawyers for indigent defendants ran out.”  This is part of a series of devastating cuts in recent months affecting the two components of the federal public defender program – salaried full-time federal public defenders and private criminal defense lawyers who are appointed to cases for an hourly fee.


Considering comprehensive federal judgeships legislation

Today, the United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Bankruptcy and the Courts will conduct a hearing on Senate Bill 1385.  If passed, the Federal Judgeships Act of 2013 would authorize the establishment of 70 new federal appeals and district court judgeships.


Time to end the dangerous shell game

Iran heads the list of countries the United States and other nations have targeted for sanctions because of its believed nuclear weapons goal and its support of terrorist groups. There are few governments that elicit more concern among Americans than the one in Tehran.


Collection attorneys and the credit system

It’s almost impossible to imagine a world without credit. Major purchases like a home, car, college education, and vacations would be difficult even for the wealthy and virtually impossible for everyone else.  So many things that make our life comfortable can be attributed to our ability to obtain credit. Consumer spending makes up over 70 percent of the U.S. economy and is driven by the availability of credit.


Holder’s new sentencing policy means Congress must act

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s Monday announcement that the Justice Department will change its approach to punishing federal drug offenders is a pivotal step in criminal justice reform. But unless Congress implements legislation consistent with these policy shifts, they could end the moment he leaves his office for the last time. Holder’s new policy is only discretionary, and could be reversed by a new administration.


Trayvon Martin, Edward Snowden and fear

Edward Snowden is a white adult who had access to government secrets and was willing to be exiled and risk prosecution to reveal them.

Trayvon Martin was a black minor who didn’t choose to get killed and certainly cannot flee to a safe haven now.

Despite these differences, a common thread links these two Americans. They are both victims of a national approach to public safety that’s driven by fear. In recent decades, policymakers have become so committed to constraining, supervising, and punishing Americans in the name of security they’ve built the world’s largest system of surveillance and punishment. And now those systems are engulfing the likes of Snowden and Martin alike.


The SEC’s power grab threatens to distort the US justice system

The American legal system is based on the fundamental distinction between criminal and civil proceedings.  Criminal justice agencies have awesome powers – to wiretap our phones, to read our mail, to search our homes – but they are also subject to extra-strength due process protections, including the probable cause standard for searches, the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and a suppression rule to exclude improperly obtained evidence. Civil regulators, by contrast, operate under looser standards, with fewer procedural protections.