This tribunal is the court in which citizens seek redress against the federal government for monetary claims.
No one who values words, and no one who defends Judeo-Christian civilization from the barbarians within our gates, will ever use “same-sex marriage.”
Social conservatives have attacked the Supreme Court because of how its opinion disagrees with theirs, not because of how the Court has overstepped its boundaries.
The Supreme Court’s recent decision to broadly interpret the Fair Housing Act is clearly a victory for civil rights. But why hasn’t the Supreme Court applied the same rationale to the death penalty?
The Supreme Court’s decision Friday does not usher in an era of marriage “equality.” Rather, it ushers in an era of marriage irrelevancy, at least in a legal sense.
Roberts and his five colleagues created an ambiguity in the clear provision that limits subsidies to those exchanges “established by a State.”
Medicaid eligibility terminates when a person is placed in custody.
Multinational corporations have begun invoking Romer and the Equal Protection Clause in challenging common-sense public health, environmental, and even minimum wage laws.
Police have a perverse incentive to seize money through the DOJ’s Equitable Sharing Program.
Most of my friends who survived still cannot sleep without the lights on, even after 17 years.