Judicial

Need for copyright protection hits home

In the world of theatre, the people working backstage sometimes don’t get the credit they deserve for making sure the show runs smoothly. The same could be said for the creative fields in general. For every talented professional in the spotlight, there are scores of talented professionals working behind the scenes, and it is paramount that we make sure their creativity and labor is afforded the protection it deserves.

Like many creative people who work in the arts for a living, I don't spend a lot of time thinking about copyright law. However a recent experience brought to my attention how important its protections can be for an independent author and artist like myself.

Read More...

House Judiciary To examine copyright, technology roles In economy

Tomorrow the House Judiciary Committee begins the first of two hearings on the roles of copyright and technology in the economy.

These hearings can highlight the need for objective, empirical data in our copyright policymaking, which the National Academy of Sciences recently announced is in short supply.  The hearings also laudably acknowledge the need to consider how copyright policy may affect our world-class technology sector and the Internet at large.  The unfortunate ‘Stop Online Piracy Act’ (SOPA) controversy resulted from just such an oversight, fueled by bad data, including studies and figures whose legitimacy had been questioned by the Government Accountability Office.  Consulting all stakeholders will help avoid future debacles.

Read More...

Sequestration threatens to eviscerate federal public defenders

In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright that all defendants facing serious crimes are entitled to a lawyer. For more than eleven years, I have proudly worked for the Federal Public Defender program, an organization founded by Congress to fulfill this constitutional mandate.

Read More...

In support of a legal pioneer

The most influential advocacy sometimes flows from the bravery of our allies. Thanks to one such ally of women in the military, I was able to attend college at the Virginia Military Institute, an opportunity that was made available to women only sixteen years ago. That ally is Nina Pillard, now a nominee for the D.C. Circuit Court, who will have her confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee this Wednesday.

Read More...

Metals theft bill gives brass ring to criminals

Metals theft is a serious crime. Thieves can strike anywhere – an iron fence stolen from a farm, an air conditioner gone missing from a home, or a catalytic converter cut from a car. The more than 100 scrap recyclers visiting Capitol Hill today are on the front lines every day, working hand-in-hand with local law enforcement and prosecutors, trying to prevent metals theft. Unfortunately, current proposals in Congress could handcuff these positive efforts through the well-intentioned, but poorly crafted Metal Theft Prevention Act (S.394/HR 867).

Read More...

Time to rethink harsh drug sentences

A bipartisan panel charged with taming the decades-long proliferation of federal crimes today takes up the question of whether an offense, to qualify as a crime, should involve criminal intent.

The criminalization of behavior involving no criminal intent -- mens rea, in legal parlance -- is part of the reason the number of federal offenses on the books has swelled over the past three decades to a staggering 4,500, including many that are obviously unnecessary, and even absurd.

Read More...

The best player for changing the patent troll game

With recent legislative proposals in both the House and Senate, a White House study on the impact of patent trolls on innovation, and Federal Circuit Judges calling for judges to use Rule 11 sanctions and Section 285 fee shifting provisions more frequently, there are many players trying to curb frivolous lawsuits brought on by patent trolls.  With so many participants involved, the debate on how best, or who best, to control frivolous patent litigation has become heated.

Read More...

Supreme Court’s decision harms minorities

With its ruling on the Voting Rights Act, the Supreme Court has taken the country back to a time when racial minorities were unable  to participate equitably in the voting process.  The Court’s unprecedented decision is disgraceful to civil rights leaders and legislators who have fought to preserve equal voting rights in this country.

Read More...

DOMA is dead, But the fight for equality is far from over

This week, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of equality and progress.  In overturning the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the Court gave long overdue recognition of our fundamental human rights. At long last, the federal government will no longer treat same-sex couples as separate and unequal under the law.

Read More...

Despite court ruling, voter suppression is rampant

In striking down a central provision of the Voting Rights Act, the U.S. Supreme Court hammered a stake into the heart of a law that’s been used to guarantee fair elections in this country since the mid-1960s.

It’s now left up to a dysfunctional and highly partisan Congress to fix the law.  And if I had my way, we’d already be working on it.

Read More...

Pages