THE HILL
 

New reason for devotion to Employee Free Choice Act

By Leo W. Gerard, USW International President - 09/15/09 09:42 AM ET

Norma Rae and Teddy Kennedy are dead.

Well, the woman on whom the 1979 Academy Award winning movie Norma Rae was based – Crystal Lee Sutton – died Sept. 12. Sen. Kennedy died just weeks earlier on Aug. 25.

Brain cancer felled both iconic labor heroes.

It was a hell of a start to the AFL-CIO’s 26th Constitutional Convention in Pittsburgh this weekend. 


Caroline Kennedy stood in for her uncle Monday, telling the delegates she’d promised to speak on his behalf. She asked the delegates to devote themselves to the labor struggles to which Sen. Kennedy had dedicated his life, one of which was the Employee Free Choice Act.

Passage of the act, which would ease union organizing and completing first contracts, would definitely be a cause for celebration by industrial organizations and federations of labor.
Crystal Lee Sutton’s story reinforces why it’s vital Congress pass the act.

At age 17, she began working for a J.P. Stevens textile mill in Roanoke Rapids, N.C., where conditions and pay were poor.

In the early 1970s, labor organizer Eli Zivkovich, moved to Roanoke Rapids and enlisted her help to establish a union at the mill. By then, she was 33, had three children, and was earning $2.65 an hour. To try to convince co-workers to form a union to bargain for improvements, Sutton walked door-to-door and went to work early.

“When I went in the plant with my union pin, you would have thought I had the plague and that is when the trouble started. It was truly different because a woman had never done or dared to do such stuff,” Sutton said in a June, 2008 interview.

A manager fired her when she copied a flyer put up by the mill that claimed black workers would run the union.

Before she left that day, Sutton took a stand that was recounted verbatim in the film, Norma Rae, in which Sally Fields starred.  “I took a piece of cardboard and wrote the word UNION on it in big letters, got up on my work table, and slowly turned it around. The workers started cutting their machines off and giving me the victory sign. All of a sudden the plant was very quiet,” she said.



Police physically removed Sutton from the mill. But the Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union (ACTWU) won the right to represent the workers. That’s what people remember from the film. A great victory. What they don’t know is that J.P. Stevens officials didn’t sign a labor contract with the union until a decade later.

That’s why the Employee Free Choice Act must pass. Not only do companies threaten, harass and illegally fire workers like Sutton who try to form unions, but even when workers finally do win union representation, corporations wrongly hold up negotiations to deny workers their first labor contract – as J. P. Stevens did.

In that case, the workers won on both counts. They ultimately got a labor contract – a decade later, and in 1977 a court ordered Stevens to pay Sutton back wages and restore her job. 

But in far too many cases, workers win on no counts. They never get to organize because of aggressive and illegal actions used with impunity by corporations that hire union-busting consultants.

That is tragic for America because good union wages were critical to creating and are crucial to sustaining the nation’s middle class.

Teddy Kennedy, a rich man who spent his career legislating for the working man, once said, “I say you spell Kennedy L-A-B-O-R.”

Caroline Kennedy said yesterday, “It is time to make the dreams of Teddy Kennedy’s career a reality.”

She urged the AFL-CIO delegates to do as Dr. Martin Luther King summoned striking sanitation workers in Memphis to do just before his death: “Let us rise up tonight with a greater readiness. Let us stand with a greater determination. And let us move on in these powerful days, these days of challenge, to make America what it ought to be.”

For Kennedy, for Sutton, for us all, America ought to have the Employee Free Choice Act.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/labor/58747-new-reason-for-devotion-to-employee-free-choice-act-

Comments (11)

Mr. Gerard:Realizin g that you and your fellow union bosses need the delusionally-dubbed Employee Free Choice Act to ensure YOUR survival, perhaps it is worth mentioning what has happened to the textile industry that Ms. Sutton sought so valliantly to unionize. Is it here in the U.S., or did it move overseas?How about the Steel industry? Let's not even mention having to bailout the auto industry.The problem with EFCA is that will will kill jobs, period. But that's okay as long as you get your union dues from those few companies that remain, right?Oh, and by the way, thanks for starting a trade war with China last weekend. That's going to help end the recession! (LOL!)Best wishes on the rest of your convention as you plot ways for unions to take over the economy (you've done such a fantastic job so far).BY Dienekes on 09/15/2009 at 12:05
I wish we could be spared from those who use the deaths of someone to push an evil cause. The Employee Free Choice Act strips workers of a secret ballot and is simply a fascist style power grab by trade unions who simply have trouble selling their troubled product to American workers. Why is there nothing more magnificent than a rich limosine liberal such as Teddy Kennedy being oh so generous with taxpayers money? Teddy and Caroline live the life of luxury, unwilling to give up their possessions, and justify their lifestyle by forcing less well off taxpayers to fund causes they could easily support.BY Dave Palen on 09/15/2009 at 14:52
The offshoring of jobs to China/Mexico/Thailand/Korea effects all Americans. Including you two whiners. EFCA does not strip the secret ballot provision from the NLRA. It allows employees to make the decision to unionize instead of employers as it is now. Secret ballot elections under the NLRB are nothing at all similar to elections for elected offices. Employers have tainted NLRB elections so badly with firings and intimidation that workplace democracy is destroyed. It has been proven tainted by testimony in front of Congress by those wrongfully terminated for attempting to join a union. By the way you big mouths, get your facts straight. EFCA, YES!BY daniel t on 09/15/2009 at 15:30
Daniel: You are both right and wrong. You are right in that NLRB elections are not like elections for elected office…politica l campaigns are much longer. Your are wrong on the part about EFCA not removing the secret ballot. As written EFCA flat out states that if a majority of employees sign union authorizations, "the Board shall not direct an election but shall certify the individual or labor organization as the representative…" Read the bill, moron. Here is my hope: As/if EFCA gets passed, I hope union bosses 'man up' to all the companies they will have killed and the jobs they will have helped destroy. Hoenesty is probably too much to expect from union bosses though.BY Dienekes on 09/15/2009 at 16:02
EFCA is a modification to current labor law, the NLRA. Sec. 9 of the NLRA (which covers elections) does not go away under EFCA if employees choose it. The employees must request this to the NLRB when they file a petition for union representation (something they must do) after signing cards. EFCA is two fold. Representation by card check (based on majority status) or secret ballot if THEY REQUEST IT. They request either way on a RC petition which the NLRB currently uses. Employees make that decision not the employer. Rep. Young ® of Alaska just clearly stated today that the secret ballot provision of the NLRA does not go away under EFCA. If he gets it, why can't you ? By the way, what is a union boss ?BY Daniel T on 09/15/2009 at 16:57
Nowhere in the bill does it state "if workers request it". If Don Young stated it, he is like all the other polticians who don't read the bills they vote for. Being that 'card-check' appears to be a loser, in exchange for short elections, it makes this discussion a rather moot point anyway. Card-check isn't as big a job killer as binding arbitration is anyway. Fact is, you will have an appointee of the federal government dictating wages, benefits and other terms and conditions…How many small businesses do you think are going to stay open, and how many large companies are going to keep jobs here? It's a job killer, Daniel. If we top out at 11% unemployment during this recession, figure EFCA will increase it to 15% or more. BTW: A union boss is the boss of a cartel.BY Dienekes on 09/15/2009 at 17:20
Daniel is either playing dumb or just trying to trick the readers. No employee will make a choice under EFCA regarding a secret ballot. The paid union organizers will make that choice. If a majority signs the union cards, the organizer can either get a union certified immediately, or ask for an election. Why have an election when you get what you want automatically. Besides, if an election is held, the employer can present facts that the unions don't want workers to hear.This is a joke of a bill that will only help ensure that our economy stays in a recession. Liberals don't understand that in order to fund their non-profits and government jobs, they actually need a vibrant private sector to make sure that tax revenue funds their positions. Most Democrats support EFCA because labor unions, in effect, take dues from hard working employees and send them right to the campaign chests of the party. That is why labor unions and trial lawyers are the favored special interests of Obama and most Democrats.BY David Palen on 09/15/2009 at 17:32
EFCA is a joke. It is no more than a political payback to corrupt politicians like my former opponent, Rock Bottom ObamaBY aurelius on 09/15/2009 at 21:23
You people are showing your true ignorance of labor law. EFCA is not labor law. Rep. Don Young ® gets it but you can't. It is a modification to current labor law namely the NLRA(national labor relations act). Current law also provides for card check recognition if the employer agrees to it and some companies do such as; ATT,Dana, Navistar, etc.. Read Sec. 9 of the NLRA Sec. 7. Both sections do not go away under EFCA. Employees should absolutely have the right to determine unionization efforts on their own through card check (majority sign up) or secret ballot(their decision not the union organizer/employer). Taft-Hartley and the Wagner Act stay in tact under EFCA. You are correct that card check certification may go away under a compromise but so what? Labor law is broken so badly that it is going to be repaired and you will see it this year. By the way, arbitration procedures are the preferred method to use in every dispute out there not just labor. It works for all parties and it is fair. Another thing boys, union organizers are usually called upon by employees who want assistance in gaining union representation to better their working lives. On the other hand if union organizers are soliciting membership into the union they represent, so what ? Its America, not Nazi Germany and thank God for that!BY Daniel T on 09/16/2009 at 10:13
I am shocked and amazed by the inaccuracies and class hatred displayed in these posts. Unions are the only vehicle by which the average American worker can secure decent wages and working conditions. That is why it was officially declared to be the policy of the United States to encourage workers to organize and collectively bargain for their wages and working conditions. Those who think otherwise have never read the National Labor Relations Act; a sad state of affairs for an allegedly politcal blog. How can you argue about something you have obviously no factual knowlege of?The following link is offered with the hopes of clearing up these misconceptions of the proposed Employee Free Choice Act.Here's a link to the text of the proposed bill: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:S560:BY Brian Miller on 09/18/2009 at 15:33

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.