Let’s be clear, I think Martin’s tweets were offensive. That’s not debatable. When I called Martin, he told me his intent was to mock soccer as inferior to American football in order to rile his friend Piers Morgan. He seemed very sincere to me and I believe him, but that hardly excuses using anti-gay rhetoric to make his point.
What is also not debatable for me is Roland Martin is not a homophobe. I’ve spent time with him and his wife. I’ve had both public and private conversations with him about his opposition to “Don’t ask, don’t tell”, his opposition to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), his support of gay adoption, and our individual personal lives and relationships. He is not the kind of person to advocate violence against LGBT people, or anyone else for that matter. Context matters.
So, what is the appropriate response? When Martin and I spoke, he told me no one from GLAAD had called him to talk with him before they called for his head. I spoke with a GLAAD representative who confirmed that no one called Martin to have a private conversation with him and that the only communications with Martin were through the twitter exchange on Super Bowl Sunday.
Our society has a tendency to escalate conflict and immediately go to destroy mode. Too few people seem to care to create real resolutions. Nowhere is this more apparent than in our politics. The tone of discourse in Washington DC is corrosive. The level of contempt for each other demonstrated by our elected leaders influence the nature of public discourse across our country. When elected officials are more interested in destroying each other than doing the people’s business; when compromise and seeking common ground is a political liability, we are trouble. Washington D.C. is and has been in gridlock for a long time. Almost nothing is getting done. Officials are often more interested in making points than finding solutions. Too often they focus on one-upmanship and demonization of those whose points of view are different from their own.
I think that we walk a very dangerous road when we turn the volume and the heat up so high and—in this day of twitter and facebook—so quickly that the only possible outcome is war. Often, the casualty is to make enemies out of those who could be allies.
Many of us pray for a day homophobia and racism and HIV/AIDS are things of the past and when marginalizing people on the basis of identity no longer happens. So I wonder if we might benefit by expanding our tool box beyond confrontation. Black communities are up in arms over the possible removal of one of the few Black commentators from television news. Might we consider strategies that won’t pit Black people against gay people with some of us stuck in the middle?
Roland Martin is a friend. I have lots of friends who say and do things that I find stupid or offensive. And I’m reminded every day that God is not done with me yet, either. I am grateful every time someone takes the time to help me work on my stuff.
Few would argue that homophobia still exists in Black communities and that racism and other kinds of stigma are alive and well in LGBT communities. But I hope we can all agree that while much work is left to be done, we are not where we used to be, and that sometimes it is better to turn toward one another rather than on one another.
Martin Luther King Jr. said, “The old law of an eye for an eye leaves everybody blind. It is immoral because it seeks to humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding. It seeks to annihilate rather than to convert.”
Wilson is the President and CEO of the Black AIDS Institute, the only national HIV/AIDS think tank in the United States focused exclusively on Black people.