THE HILL
 

Newspapers for a new age (Rep. Carolyn Maloney)

By Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) - 09/24/09 01:50 PM ET

New York is a city which moves at a dizzying speed, but the way information moves today can make even the tech-savviest New Yorker's head spin. Today's Kindle-clutching, iPhone toting subway rider who braves the rush hour commute spends every waking hour in a world of nonstop news and information which none of us could have ever imagined just a few years ago.

The changes in how we all access and consume information have done more than just change the landscape of my city, it's also changed the news industry as a whole -- taking a brutal toll on the print news media, whose importance in providing original reporting and investigating issues of public concern is timeless. It is no secret that the newspaper industry has fallen on hard times which have only been exacerbated by the painful economic woes our country is still working its way out of. Digital media, bloggers, news aggregators, and citizen journalists all on the internet have forever altered the speed at which news and ideas are disseminated. And while there are many out there chronicling what ails our country's newspapers, community dailies continue to shut down their presses, and not nearly enough is being done to find ways to preserve these institutions.

This morning, I am holding a hearing of the Joint Economic Committee to examine the treacherous economic landscape newspapers face. The role they play in our democracy -- today and throughout our nation's history -- is too important to allow them to recede further. I expect testimony to cover many different issues, including many of the ideas for the future of newspapers which have already been discussed - and hopefully several new ideas as well. This hearing comes on the heels of my submission of H.R. 3602, a bill which will enable local newspapers to take advantage of non-profit status as a way to preserve their place in communities nationwide. Since the ratification of the Bill of Rights, the federal government has acknowledged that the press is an institution which is afforded special protections by name. In this spirit, I think that the government can help foster solutions for this industry in ways which protect the independence of newspapers and enables their objective reporting to thrive in a new economic and media climate.

It may seem ironic to defend newspapers in this space. But in so many ways the change brought about by the digital media amplifies what is written in newspapers. The internet and mobile devices extend news and information in a way that has open dialogues to more and more aspects of our life. The internet has allowed anyone, regardless of background or world view, to express themselves, connect with others, and access an entire world of electronic information. But the ability for dedicated staffs with greater resources to investigate and report on issues large and small provides a critical check on institutions that otherwise lack a critical body of oversight focused solely on the public interest.

Cross-posted from the Huffington Post.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/60215-newspapers-for-a-new-age-rep-carolyn-maloney

Comments (17)

Your premise is sound, but your conclusions are flawed (imho). Recognizing that we live in an electronic world, most/all newspapers have a presence online. The investigative reporting to publish those articles; irrespective of where they are published; remains the same. You fail to mention that some newspapers thrive, while others are failing. They are failing because no one wants to read them…PERIOD! Newspapers that marginalize news in accordance to their political leanings, are NOT providing the public any worthwhile service, and deserve to suffer the slow economic death they are encountering. In a society where 'freedom of choice' exists (at least temporarily), it is THEIR choice to print drivel. The also have the choice to produce a product that people can rely on because it is trustworthy news.I can understand why you posted this at the Huffington Post. Try posting it at American Thinker and see what kind of response you get.BY Savant Noir on 09/24/2009 at 16:12
You may call them institutions, everyone else calls them lie institutions, thats why they fail.BY ANN on 09/24/2009 at 16:14
Newspapers' revenue doesn't come from subscriptions, it comes from advertising. Also, people who read the newspaper these days do so because of the crossword puzzles, comics and local news, and are often of the older 50 generation. It's paranoia to trivialize newspapers as caving into political leanings and characterizing them as lie institutions as the reason for their demise.BY Sue on 09/24/2009 at 17:48
So are they to BIG to fail to? lets print more money. why not,BY ANN on 09/24/2009 at 18:32
Rep. Maloney, the public at large has already made them a NON-PROFIT business. That's their problem. They're losing money because nobody is reading them. Nobody bought buggy whips after cars were invented. Giving the buggy whip manufacturers non-profit status wouldn't have solved their problem either. I know it hurts you Democrats to lose your propaganda pals, but short of legislation requiring everyone in the nation to purchase a newspaper subscription or face a large fine (you know, kind of like pending Obamacare legislation) the newspapers are going the way of the dinosaur.BY Terry on 09/24/2009 at 19:05
errrrr…Sue? Newsflash for you. Online newspapers have many advertiser's. The point remains the same, if no one wants to read it, no one will want to advertise on it either.BY Savant Noir on 09/25/2009 at 00:49
OMG TERRY Don't give them any ideas, we will have a tax put on us next if we dont buy the newspaper.BY ANN on 09/25/2009 at 06:46
The public is turning against print media because they have become the propaganda wing of the Democratic Party, so no one is surprised that a Democrat wants to give another bailout to their media wing… So THEY get the tax break that Democrats refuse to give to the rest of us…BY Dorine McKinnon on 09/25/2009 at 07:32
Nicely written article, but I disagree. Not only do many of these newspapers have their content online, but reading them online is more environmentally friendly. And who wants to cart a newspaper on their train commute and open it up in a crowded subway car when they can pull out an iPhone and read identical content without disrupting other passengers?BY OPTED Magazine on 09/25/2009 at 08:59
It's a fact, large retailers no longer take out multi-page advertising in newspapers. Stick you head in the sand if you want, Savant, but it's a fact. It doesn't matter who reads it or not.BY Sue on 09/25/2009 at 11:34

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.