|
|
|
|
|
May 4, 2006, 4:19 am
By
The Hill
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) and Rep. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. (R-Wis.) introduced legislation to reauthorize portions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that were set to expire next year. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) spoke about the importance of the legislation
The Voting Rights Act is the most important Civil Rights legislation of the 20th Century...It enforced the 15th Amendment, ensuring that all Americans could enjoy the most basic right of citizens in a democracy – the right to vote. Unfortunately, even in the 21st Century we continue to see attempts to disenfranchise minority voters. We cannot permit the Voting Rights Act to expire and leave the next generation of Americans without full protection for their voting rights.
Archived under:
Campaign, Civil Rights, Politics
|
May 3, 2006, 1:45 pm
By
House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi
The Washington Post called this bill a ruse, House Democrats call it a sham, and for the American people, it's a shame. When the energy companies write the energy bill, we have gasoline that costs $3 a gallon; when pharmaceutical companies write the Medicare prescription drug bill, we have a bill full of giveaways to cronies, but nothing for America's seniors; when lobbyists write the lobbying reform bill, we end up with a ruse that winks at reform and does nothing to curtail the culture of corruption.
Democrats offered real reform legislation and Republicans voted it down. It is clear that Republicans don't want to end the culture of corruption because they continue to benefit from it.
Archived under:
Campaign, Lawmaker News, Politics
|
May 3, 2006, 1:01 pm
By
The Hill
House Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) commended the bipartisan passage of the lobbying reform bill today. The legislation passed by a vote of 217 to 213 with 8 Democrats voting for the bill, while 20 Republicans voted against the legislation.
This legislation will hold lobbyists and Members accountable for their actions...The Lobbying Accountability and Transparency Act will help restore Americans' trust in their legislature, and I'm pleased a bipartisan group voted to solve a bipartisan problem
Archived under:
Campaign, Politics
|
May 3, 2006, 12:17 pm
By
The Hill
House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) criticized the Bush Administration for fiscal policies which resulted in decreases in personal income and increasing budget deficits.
President Bush displayed today why Americans are now giving him the lowest ratings of his presidency on his handling of the economy: He, along with Congressional Republicans, refuses to acknowledge and address the economic challenges being faced by American families. Under President Bush, median household income has decreased by $1,670 and the number of Americans living without health insurance has increased by 6 million. At the same time, American families are faced with skyrocketing prices at the pump and soaring health care costs.
Read more...
Archived under:
Economy & Budget, Politics, The Administration
|
|
May 3, 2006, 11:21 am
By
The Hill
Archived under:
Energy & Environment, Politics
|
May 3, 2006, 11:06 am
By
The Hill
House Majority Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) labeled Democrats obstructionist for blocking passage of a bill that would expand oil refinery production.
House Republicans today took action to move forward on legislation that will expand our nation’s refining capacity and lessen our dependence on foreign oil, but 185 Democrats voted to block progress on lowering the price of gas. The American people are paying the price at the gas pump, and it’s time for the House Democrats to join our effort to provide relief.
We have not built a new refinery in the United States in the past 30 years. We need action to increase our domestic ability to refine oil. This issue is not going away, and I challenge the Democrats to join us as we continue to work to ease the burden gas prices have placed on Americans.
Archived under:
Energy & Environment, Politics
|
May 3, 2006, 10:08 am
By
N.H. GOP Rep. Charles Bass
My bill would coordinate a badly disjointed process for seeking approval to build new biofuel, gasoline, or diesel refineries in the United States.
We should assist local, state, and federal officials in confronting the confusing and sometime contradictory regulations, approval timelines, and permits required by dozens of regulatory agencies. Managing the process collaboratively would also result in greater public transparency and adherence to the critical environmental reviews and assessments that are required.
Our motor fuel supplies continue to be too tight to meet the demand of America and we need to address the situation comprehensively by increasing domestic production, supporting the transition to renewable biofuels, and promoting greater conservation.
Archived under:
Energy & Environment, Lawmaker News, Politics
|
|
May 3, 2006, 9:44 am
By
Calif. Dem. Rep. Lois Capps
While there has been a decrease in the number of refineries, this is due to increasing market concentration resulting from refinery mergers. Thus, big oil, and not environmental or public health laws are to blame for fewer, but bigger refineries. If the Republicans want someone to blame for the shortage of refinery capacity and high gas prices they should try looking at themselves and taking responsibility their failed energy policy.
Archived under:
Energy & Environment, Lawmaker News, Politics
|
|
May 3, 2006, 9:34 am
By
Mass. Dem. Rep. Barney Frank
When you start talking about compensation making up 12% of corporate profits, you're talking about real money, amounts of money so large that they are drains on the economy, so of course there would be less money to deal with pensions, healthcare, or other factors.
What we are doing, we are not telling the stockholder what they can and cannot do, but we think they should be able to vote on it, on such compensation.
Archived under:
Economy & Budget, Lawmaker News, Politics
|
May 3, 2006, 7:04 am
By
The Hill
House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) criticized Democrats for voting against legislation to enhance oil refinery capacity last year.
Today, Capitol Hill Democrats have a choice: They can either back up their rhetoric and act to address America’s energy concerns or once again say "No" and continue their chronic negligence on energy policy.
Last year the House passed the Gasoline for America's Security Act (H.R. 3893), comprehensive legislation to encourage new refinery capacity and ban price-gouging – yet EVERY Democrat voted against the proposal. And they wonder why we have high energy prices?
Read more...
Archived under:
Energy & Environment, Politics
|
|
Congress Blog Most Popular Stories
|
|
Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.
|