It may look obvious but logically not every website can come out at or near the top of Google’s search results, and so there will always be a party who is unhappy about their rankings. Moreover, and more importantly, Google is a company like any other with the purpose to maximize profits via excelling its business practices i.e. online searching and advertising. It should not be therefore shocking that it would want to prefer its own products or products of its partners to the ones of its competitors. Otherwise, we could soon appear in the absurd situation when regulators launch investigation into allegations that; for instance, Mercedes does not sell cars of BMW or Audi. Furthermore, unsatisfied consumers have choice to turn into a different search engine such as Yahoo or Bing. Therefore, the allegations with regard to Google’s abuse of its dominant position have weak grounds and are contrary to the business rationale.
Yet it seems that Google’s legal battles are a never-ending story. In March, France asked the European authorities to scrutinize Google’s new privacy rules. In addition, recently the European Commission approved Google’s proposed acquisition of Motorola Mobility which is sued by Samsung, and since April it has been also investigated by the EU’s competition authorities for possibly abusing its patents following complaints by Microsoft and Apple. If Google closes the deal with Motorola Mobility it will effectively get itself into another EU antitrust investigation.
The gathering legal proceedings could have significant adverse economic impacts on the search group, similar to the ones in the landmark antitrust case against Microsoft. The multi-front war against several competition authorities at the same time will not be easy to win. There are too many complainants who will not be satisfied with mere promises.
Geiger is managing partner of EU lobbying firm Alber & Geiger