

A bipartisan offender: The Internet Radio Fairness Act
We are stunned by how little attention has been paid to the treacherous parts of the so-called Internet Radio Fairness Act — the parts that have nothing to do with the royalty rates paid to artists and everything to do with shutting down speech and agency capture.
Among other things the bill would stand antitrust law on its head, and would permit dominant players like Sirius XM and Clear Channel to sue any group of sound recording owners — any — if they “impede” the efforts of these two behemoths to make direct licensing deals with record companies.
This is not to say that the proposed bill does not include significant changes to the government mandated royalties for the public performance of sound recordings. We agree with the 125 artists who signed an open letter to Pandora and the newly formed Internet Radio Fairness Coalition asking for fair negotiations rather than asking the government to step in to change the way those rates are calculated.
Thomas Shatz, president of the Council for Citizens Against Government Waste said it best: “The result [the Internet Radio Fairness Coalition seeks] is to move nearly 1,800 entities that currently operate under the market-based standard down to the below-market standard, instead of moving the three grandfathered entities up to the market-based standard.”
The good news is that this bill could provide a moment of bipartisan cooperation, for it’s filled with things that offend both Democratic and Republican sensibilities.
Lowery is the founder of the bands Cracker and Camper Van Beethovan, and teaches in the Music Business Program at the University of Georgia at Athens. Castle is a music and technology attorney based in Austin, Texas.








Most Viewed RSS Feed »
