THE HILL
 

Digital rules of the road key to National Broadband Plan

By Motion Picture Association of America Chairman and CEO Dan Glickman - 09/18/09 02:26 PM ET

I had the opportunity this week to join the FCC conversation about the development of a National Broadband Plan.  The discussion centered on content and reflected a keen awareness that any strategy aimed at promoting economic opportunities through broadband must include sensible safeguards for the millions of Americans who make their living in today’s digital economy with their ideas and creativity.

What Frank Sinatra sang about “love and marriage” is equally true for content and broadband.  To build a successful digital future, “you can’t have one without the other.”  Robust broadband networks offer the creative community a virtually limitless array of new ways to reach and expand their audiences.  And, compelling content is a primary reason more and more Americans are seeking out the enhanced online experience that the high-speed Internet delivers.

The expansion of broadband can have an enormously positive impact on the ability of consumers to access all sorts of content, from news to government decision-making (including the FCC workshop) to home videos to film and television.  But the Internet economy will not flourish in a lawless environment, where the rights and protections of others are not respected and where there are no rules of the road.

The Internet must be a safe and secure environment where the protections provided in the offline world, exist in the online world, too.  This will benefit consumers as new digital offerings flourish, and it will safeguard creative industries, like the movie business, which alone employs 2.5 million Americans in all 50 states.

Contrary to the headlines surrounding the most successful summer blockbusters, most movies don’t make their money back at the box office.  They require DVD, home video and a legitimate Internet market to recoup their investment—precisely those markets most vulnerable to piracy.  Given the intent of Congress in asking the FCC to develop this plan—to stimulate job creation and economic growth—the Commission should advise Congress to encourage best practices for online content security and technological innovation to protect copyrighted materials.

Our industry is committed to providing consumers with diverse and exciting online choices.  Both full-length movies as well as popular TV shows are available online to rent, view or download to own.  Multitudes of partners are devoted to online distribution and more consumer choices become available virtually every day.

As we look to the future, it’s important that the US lead by example and ensure property rights are a cornerstone of our nation’s broadband plan.  Many countries, such as the UK and France, already are moving ahead.  And, we don’t want to repeat the mistakes of countries like South Korea, where super-fast broadband—in the absence of common-sense content protections—has led to a tidal wave of piracy.

It’s important that we press forward with innovations that can help.  Existing technologies are useful but rudimentary compared to possible future developments.  It is critical that the Commission not stunt the development of dynamic, next generation technologies and the positive outcomes they can help us achieve in advancing broadband and digital economic opportunities, hand-in-hand.

Chairman Genachowski himself summed up the dilemma in his confirmation hearings in June. “Illegal copyright infringement,” he said, “is a threat to the creativity that our copyright laws are designed to protect and encourage, and a threat to a significant contributor to our economy and U.S. global competitiveness.”

That’s a clear statement of the problem—and the opportunity—if we get the rules of the road right at this critical juncture for U.S. broadband leadership.   Only robust infrastructure and sensible safeguards together can achieve Congress’ goal of driving American innovation, economic growth and consumer choice for many years to come.  It’s time to seize the moment.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/59425-digital-rules-of-the-road-key-to-national-broadband-plan

Comments (4)

why do we need a national broadband plan? no one has said why we need one yet other than to articulate some vague idea that we need to keep up with the Jones', that is, with South Korea whose got the faster internet, and we're so behind! — but now it turns out that they've got something where piracy is rampant.BY John Smith on 09/20/2009 at 19:33
"It’s time to seize the moment."You meant to say "seize the internet", right?I guess if the US Post office could legally open and read everyone's mail at will as it passed through the system, that would be alright with you as well, right? The last thing we need is the government directly wired to every home, corporate network, and email server in the country, with uncontested license to do what it wants. Tax what it wants. Regulate and Legislate what it wants.Now you want to nationalize the internet? This is all about revenue and control, and frankly, we're getting tired of it… I bought your DVD's. Keep your d*mn hands off my internet.BY DWright on 09/20/2009 at 19:45
Pirate software and movies will always be an issue, regardless of who controls the pipe, or how fast that pipe is, as long as you fail to secure your data. This is a bogus argument. Shouldn't we focus on laws that already exist, but people are afraid to enforce? People are telling us the internet is the issue, when in fact, it is their security they fail to maintain. Its the inevitable result of trusting your networks to people in other countries, instead of employing people in this country. You just thought it was cheaper.How about securing your data?BY Glen on 09/21/2009 at 08:20
I am against this plan solely for the reason that government should stay out of business affairs, if a customer doesn't like there service they should leave it, i think the government should take the time to stop all the stealing these companies are doing instead, all those fees, contracts that only benefits the companies, i always thought a contract to be legal was there to benefit both parties? only business are benefited from the ones i have seen,BY ANN on 09/22/2009 at 08:30

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.