The Administration

  May 3, 2010, 12:15 pm

The Big Question: Did Obama respond quickly enough to the oil spill?

By Sydelle Moore

Some of the nation's top political commentators, legislators and intellectuals offer insight into the biggest question burning up the blogosphere today.

Today's question:


Did the Obama administration respond quickly and appropriately to the Gulf Coast oil spill?


Read more...
Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 29, 2010, 1:32 pm

The Big Question: Should Obama reconsider drilling?

By Sydelle Moore

Some of the nation's top political commentators, legislators and intellectuals offer insight into the biggest question burning up the blogosphere today.

Today's question:

Should the Obama administration reconsider its offshore drilling plans because of the Gulf Coast oil spill? Read more...

Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 5, 2010, 3:57 pm

The culture of convenient transparency (Rep. Rob Bishop)

By Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah)

When President Obama said that his administration would be the most transparent in history, we wanted to believe him.  After all, he went so far as to issue a Presidential Executive order calling for greater transparency and open Government.  Despite the executive order, it soon became clear this was a façade.  Instead, this Administration has demonstrated a consistent pattern of hidden agendas and ulterior motives.

In February, I received a leaked copy of an internal Department of Interior (DOI) memo that identified as many as 13 million acres throughout the West as possible sites for national monument designations.  Such a designation would immediately place the lands under a restrictive lockdown, blocking access for public land users.  To those unfamiliar with the West, this could seem rather harmless.  After all, the Washington Monument and Statue of Liberty are two well known monuments that are visited by millions each year.  However, in the West, national monument designations sweep up large swaths of land and place them under lock and key.  This not only destroys Western communities that rely upon access to land, for such things as ranching, mining, grazing, farming and recreation, but it dries up a major source of tax revenue for local communities.
 

Read more...
Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  March 22, 2010, 3:28 pm

Reset for Obama-Clinton team in Russia

By Dr. Stacy Closson, Truman Security Fellow

Buried under the headlines of an historic vote on healthcare, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton recently returned from a two-day trip to Russia. Her time in Moscow underscores the strides the Obama-Clinton team has made in US-Russian relations since coming to office one year ago.

Talks between the United States and Russia have yielded results. On Iran, Russia has come on board to ensure, short of full sanctions, the non-infringement of the nuclear non-proliferation regime. On Afghanistan, Russia is gradually increasing its support for logistics corridors. The arms control treaty appears to be nearly complete.

It has not been easy getting to this point. The view from Moscow during the Bush administration was that the US had rolled out a menacing missile defense system on Russia’s borders, waged a needless war in Iraq, expanded NATO despite Russia’s objections, violated Serbia’s territorial integrity by recognizing Kosovo, and downplayed the aspiration of the Abkhaz and Ossetians in Georgia.

Read more...
Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  March 11, 2010, 2:14 pm

The Big Question: Will the White House vs. SCOTUS tiff escalate?

By Sydelle Moore

Some of the nation's top political commentators, legislators and intellectuals offer their insight into the biggest news story burning up the blogosphere today.




Today's question:

Chief Justice John Roberts fired back at the White House this week. Will the battle between the high court and the White House continue to escalate in 2010?

Read more...

Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  February 11, 2010, 9:30 am

The Big Question: Should Obama push recess appointments?

By Sydelle Moore

Some of the nation's top political commentators, legislators and intellectuals offer their insight into the biggest question burning up the blogosphere today .




Today's question:


Should President Barack Obama appoint stalled nominees during the Presidents' Day recess?

(Read today's answers after the jump.)

Read more...

Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  January 28, 2010, 10:46 am

The Big Question: What do you think about Obama's speech?

By Sydelle Moore

Some of the nation's top political commentators, legislators and intellectuals offer some insight into the biggest question burning up the blogosphere today .

Today's question:

What is your reaction to last night's State of the Union address from President Barack Obama? What did you think of the Republican response?


(Read today's responses after the jump.)

Read more...
Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  January 27, 2010, 11:39 am

The Big Question: What should Obama NOT say in tonight's speech?

By Sydelle Moore

Some of the nation's top political commentators, legislators and intellectuals offer insight into the biggest question burning up the blogosphere today.

Today's question:

What should President Barack Obama not say during the State of the Union address?

(Read today's responses after the jump.)

Read more...
Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  December 14, 2009, 1:43 pm

The Big Question: How would you grade Obama's presidency?

By Sydelle Moore

Some of the nation's top political commentators, legislators and intellectuals offer some insight into the biggest question burning up the blogosphere today.

Today's question:

In an interview that aired Sunday night, President Barack Obama graded his presidency so far as a "good, solid B-plus."

How would you grade the first 11 months of Barack Obama's presidency?


Cheri Jacobus, Pundits blog contributor, said:

With poll after poll indicating Obama's standing with the American public is lower in his first year than any president since they started this type of polling, it really doesn't matter what grade any pundits, the media, or inside-the-beltway types give Obama.  It doesn't matter what grade Obama gives Obama.  The American people are who count, and they are not rating President Barack Obama even close to the self-congratulatory and self-delusional B-plus he has given himself.
 
Even more interesting are polls indicating that the much-maligned former President George W. Bush is now, in hindsight, far more appreciated than in the final days of his presidency.  Since Bush hasn't done anything in a year, the only explanation for his surge in the polls is how Obama has stood up by comparison and apparently it's not all that well.
 
After staking his entire presidential campaign and at least his first 9 months of his presidency on a "blame Bush" strategy, and seeing it fail, it's no wonder Obama is trying to sound more like Bush and Vice President Cheney these days on foreign policy ...
 

Bernie Quigley, Pundits blog contributor, said:

I have a lot of complaints about Obama as a policy maker but as an individual I would give him an A. Not because of the bailouts; F on the bailouts. Not because of the war in Afghanistan; C on Afghanistan. Not because of the health care issues he has thrown in the hands of Congressional party hacks; F on that. But because he was thrown into the Presidency as an emergency measure to save the Democratic Party from complete self destruction when it could not relieve itself from Clinton dominance. This was his only requirement. And for this heroic singularity he deserves an A. He was about as qualified to be President as my brother Daryl and much less qualified than Mike, the guy who fixes my truck. That is not a criticism of him. It is an objective reading of his resume. Under these circumstances he made a remarkable adjustment. But next year we will expect results.


Brent White, professor of Law at the University of Arizona, said:

The President was handed two wars and an economy headed toward depression by the Bush administration.  He deserves a great deal of credit for the admirable job he has done handling these crises, all the while dealing with endless obstructionism from the Right.   B+


John F. McManus, president of The John Birch Society, said:

President Obama deserves high marks only for his efforts to steer the United States into the New World Order.  Under his leadership, our nation has become more deeply mired in socialism, vastly more heavily indebted, increasingly entangled in more initiatives leading to world government, and saddled with an administration full of political and moral revolutionaries who are actively working to undo the American dream. His swearing an oath to abide by the Constitution (and its many limitations on government power) is a classic example of a sick joke.  Our nation needs and deserves much, much better. Let us hope, work and pray for a great awakening of the American people so that the situation described above can be reversed and some of the harm already visited upon us can be undone.


Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist.org, said:

The Administration has made enormous but quiet progress reforming Federal government, which will have a big impact over decades. Also, Obama has restored honor to the Oval Office.

I'd suggest A-, better perhaps depending on health care reform's success.


John Feehery, Pundits blog contributor, said:

His poll ratings have fallen from the mid-sixties to the mid-forties.  His accomplishments, which are slender, were pretty much pre-cooked from the last Congress.  His major decision, to increase troops to Afghanistan, has alienated his base and took far too long to make.  He has left most of the major legislative decisions in the hands of a liberal and unpopular Democratic Congressional leadership.  It is hard to imagine how I can give him a passing grade for that performance.  


Justin Raimondo, editorial director of Antiwar.com, said:

I give President Obama an F-minus.

The F is for his continuation – and extension – of the Bush foreign policy of global intervention, especially his unconscionable escalation of the Afghan/Pakistan war. We are told that Afghanistan is a threat to the continental US because al-Qaeda is using it as a “base” to “plot” attacks on the US, when anyone can see that the actual planning and execution of the 9/11 attacks took place on American and German soil (Mohammed Atta and his confreres lived in Hamburg, Germany, before they came to the US legally). We are in for a decade-long involvement in that part of the world, regardless of what Obama says about “starting” to withdraw in 2011 – at a cost of trillions of taxpayer dollars, and many thousands of lives. To say nothing of the costs in “blowback.”

Rather than making us safer, the President’s foreign policy is endangering us, destabilizing the entire region, and allowing us to get drawn into yet another quagmire.

The F is also for his economic policies, which are destroying the dollar, impoverishing average Americans, and enriching his banker friends and supporters. See Matt Taibbi’s latest in Rolling Stone for the real story on how the President is selling out the country for the benefit of his cronies at Goldman Sachs and CitiGroup.

As for the minus – that’s for having the absolute gall to rate himself “a good solid B-plus”! What nerve.


William Redpath, chairman of the Libertarian National Committee, said:

I think President Obama is a bit biased, but then so am I.  I don’t see how anyone who thinks we should have limited government, particularly at the federal level, and who thinks the Constitution should be respected, could give his presidency anything other than an “F” so far.


Hal Lewis, professor at UC Santa Barbara, said:

All  grades depend on the  objective. If Obama's objective is to give the accumulated national treasure to the folks who will reelect him, he gets an A+ from me. If it is to load our children with an insupportable burden, that of paying off the debts he is incurring with gay abandon, another A+. If it is  to protect the country from its sworn enemies he gets an F, and if it's to protect the productivity that has given us the best living standards in the world, another F. Nothing in between, you will note.

Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  November 9, 2009, 10:32 am

Asian Caucus meets with Cabinet Secretaries: Asian Americans & Pacific Islanders have voice under Obama leadership (Rep. Mike Honda)

By Rep. Mike Honda (D- Calif.)

The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) has hosted a series of meetings with the new Cabinet Secretaries and Agency Heads of President Obama’s Administration to ensure that the concerns of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPI) are well represented throughout federal agencies.

These meetings, along with President Obama’s signing of the Executive Order re-establishing the White House Initiative on AAPIs, to be chaired by Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and Secretary of Commerce Gary Locke, reflect the Obama Administration’s commitment to the AAPI community.

While there is a model minority myth that all AAPIs thrive socio-economically, educationally, and professionally, our community is incredibly diverse, and includes underserved populations that have historically been overlooked in domestic policymaking.

Read more...
Archived under: The Administration
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
« Start< Prev12345678910Next >End »
 

More Videos »

Congress Blog Twitter - Click to follow
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.