The Topline: President
Obama called for Congress to
pass a “balanced mix of spending cuts and more tax reform” in order to
stave off some of the $85 billion in sequestration cuts set to take effect
March 1.
The movement on the sequester was welcome news for industry
groups and lawmakers who have fought against the across-the-board cuts, but
Obama’s statement appeared to do little to move the two sides closer together.
Republicans bristled at the notion of accepting more revenue
after the “fiscal cliff” deal reached last month included $600 billion in new revenues.
“It’s either going to be the sequester as written, or a
preferable reallocation of the spending cuts. But it’s going to be spending
cuts,” Rep. Tom Cole (R-Okla) told reporters Tuesday.
Obama warned that sequestration would “cost us jobs and hurt
our economy,” and urged lawmakers not to let “political dysfunction” get in the
way.
He did not lay out any new proposals Tuesday, but said that
the offers made to Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) were “still on the
table.”
Boehner indicated his resistance to more tax increases
before Obama’s remarks.
“We believe there is a better way to reduce the deficit, but Americans do not
support sacrificing real spending cuts for more tax hikes,” he said in a
statement.
The top Republicans on the House and Senate Armed Services committees, Rep. Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) and Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.), said in a
statement that Obama’s move was “better late than never.”
But they said they were opposed to the “same mix of tax
increases and defense cuts.”
Read more...