|
|
|
June 18, 2013, 8:21 pm
By
Jeremy Herb
The startling announcement came the same day four Americans were killed during a rocket attack at Bagram Air Field.
Read more...
|
|
|
June 18, 2013, 8:20 pm
By
Jeremy Herb
Four American troops were killed Tuesday in an attack at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan, a defense official said.
The U.S. troops were killed by indirect fire, which typically means weapons like rockets or mortars were fired indiscriminately from outside the perimeter, the official said.
The deaths occurred the same day as U.S. and NATO forces handed off the lead on combat operations to the Afghan security forces. The transition means that NATO troops will primarily play a supporting and advisory role to the Afghan National Security Forces.
Read more...
|
June 18, 2013, 7:07 pm
By
Carlo Munoz
Female candidates will also be able to join front-line Army and Marine
Corps infantry units as part of the decision.
Read more...
|
June 18, 2013, 6:23 pm
By
Ramsey Cox and Carlo Munoz
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) demanded Tuesday that the Pentagon end its contract with Rosoboronexport, a Russian arms dealer, because it is inadvertently harming Syrians. “American taxpayers should not be indirectly subsidizing the murder of Syrians,” Cornyn said on the Senate floor. “If the Pentagon keeps this contract it will undermine U.S. support to the Syrian people.”
Read more...
|
June 18, 2013, 6:07 pm
By
Jeremy Herb and Carlo Muñoz
The Topline: The U.S. will soon begin direct peace talks
with the Taliban after the Taliban established a new political office in Qatar
on Tuesday. The new peace talks with the U.S. and government of Afghanistan could
be a key step in winding down the war on terror, although there’s
plenty of skepticism over what the negotiations will accomplish. President Obama said Tuesday that sitting down for peace talks was an important development, even as he warned that there would be “bumps in the road” in the process. “This is an important first step towards reconciliation, although
it's a very early step,” Obama said at the G8 summit Tuesday. “We anticipate
there will be a lot of bumps in the road, but the fact that the parties have an
opportunity to talk and discuss Afghanistan's future, I think, is very important.” Republicans, however, were more pessimistic, and some said
it was the wrong time to sit down with the Taliban.
Read more...
|
June 18, 2013, 5:46 pm
By
Julian Pecquet
Sens. Bob Menendez, Carl Levin and John McCain are urging President Obama to take out Syria's air defenses.
Read more...
|
June 18, 2013, 3:36 pm
By
Jeremy Herb
Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.) did not
sound optimistic Tuesday that the Defense authorization bill would get on the floor
soon after the July 4 recess. “I’m hoping obviously for July, but I’m not sure that’s
realistic,” Levin told reporters. After July, Congress will go on a month-long recess in
August, which would then push consideration of the sweeping Pentagon policy bill
back until after Labor Day.
Read more...
|
June 18, 2013, 2:31 pm
By
Jeremy Herb
Republican senators on Tuesday said they were skeptical that anything would come from of the Taliban’s agreement to start peace talks with the
United States and the Afghan government. Several Republicans said the Obama administration had spoken
with them about the agreement on Monday, before it was announced publicly, and
they didn’t oppose the notion of talking. But there was deep pessimism that the Taliban would be willing lay down arms
until it’s defeated on the battlefield, and until the U.S. states what size force
it will leave behind in Afghanistan after it fully transfers security control
to the Afghans in 2014.
Read more...
|
June 18, 2013, 11:56 am
By
Carlo Muñoz
The plots included a previously undisclosed plan to blow up the New York Stock Exchange, NSA chief Keith Alexander said.
Read more...
|
June 18, 2013, 11:49 am
By
Erik Wasson
Senate Republicans on Tuesday voted against a 2014 military construction and veterans affairs spending bill to protest an overall lack of spending cuts. Sens. Dan Coats (R-Ind.) and Mike Johanns (R-Neb.) said they were protesting plans by the Democratic majority to move 12 annual spending bills at a higher top-line number than that called for by the 2011 sequestration law. The bill reported out of an appropriations subcommittee on Tuesday has about $1 billion more in funds for construction than one that moved through the House. The Republicans were objecting to the overall plan to move bills at the $1.058 trillion level rather than the $967 billion level being used by the House GOP. Coats said the sequester is a “clumsy and stupid way for us to govern,” but that “it is the law and whether we like it or not I think we need to honor that.” Johanns said he supported “many things” in the military construction and veterans bill. “It is not an easy ‘no’ vote to cast,” he said.
Read more...
|