THE HILL
 
comment
Print

Interior: Drilling freeze is ‘necessary and appropriate’ due to risks

By Ben Geman - 08/21/10 12:05 PM ET

The Interior Department on Saturday defended its controversial six-month ban on deepwater oil-and-gas drilling following revelations that the agency estimated it would cost 23,000 jobs.

Spokesman Matt Lee-Ashley points out that the Obama administration won an agreement from BP to set up a $100 million fund for affected workers, and a “worst case” scenario from the ban has not come to pass.

Here’s Lee-Ashley’s full response:

We have been very clear that the economic impacts of the deepwater drilling moratorium could be meaningful and would need to be addressed and mitigated, and this is why the Administration secured an agreement from BP to set up a $100 million fund for rig workers who may be adversely affected by the moratorium.



In light of the current risks of deepwater drilling as illustrated by the BP Deepwater Horizon Spill and the potential impacts of another spill, the moratorium is necessary and appropriate. With that said, the worst-case economic impact estimates from three months ago have not been realized. The reality on the ground suggests that the impacts are less than we initially projected as a potential worst-case scenario.

He said the White House Council of Economic Advisers is “coordinating” an updated analysis.



Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/e2-wire/115269-interior-drilling-freeze-is-necessary-and-appropriate-due-to-risks
E2-Wire Twitter - Click to follow
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.