On tap Thursday: White House, cabinet officials tout ‘sustainability’ efforts
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson and other officials will appear at the National Press Club to talk up the “Partnership for Sustainable Communities initiative and how it will work to support more livable and sustainable communities across the country,” an EPA advisory states.
Joining Jackson are Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and White House Domestic Policy Council Director Melody Barnes.
Here comes the neighborhood
“Through the [Partnership for Sustainable Communities] initiative, HUD, DOT and EPA are announcing new, coordinated grants to help communities create more housing choices, make transportation more efficient and reliable, reinforce existing investments, and support vibrant and healthy neighborhoods that attract businesses,” EPA said.
On tap Thursday II: Vilsack touts ethanol support
Not to be outdone, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack will also be at the National Press Club this morning. He will discuss federal efforts to help meet the 2007 law that requires 36 billion gallons of ethanol and other renewable fuels in the motor fuel mix by 2022 and “new efforts by the Obama administration to bolster the industry and reduce U.S. dependence on foreign oil.”
Poll: Boxer is hanging on in California, Brown ahead
Senate Environment and Public
Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) is maintaining a slim lead in
her reelection battle against Republican Carly Fiorina.
Boxer is
ahead by 5 points, 43 to 38 percent, with 13 percent undecided,
according to a poll released late Wednesday by the Public Policy
Institute of California. Boxer led by 7 in a PPIC poll in
September.
California Democrat Jerry Brown is also leading in
the state’s governor’s race. He’s up by 8 points, 44 to 36 percent, over
Republican Meg Whitman after she led by 1 point in September. Sixteen
percent are still undecided.
Both gubernatorial candidates
oppose California’s Proposition 23, the ballot initiative to kill the state's global-warming law. But Whitman has said she would
suspend the law for one year to make changes.
Prop 23 losing steam
The same poll provides some comfort to Prop 23's foes. According to the PPIC survey, 48 percent of
likely voters would not support the ballot initiative, 11 points ahead
of supporters. Prop 23 backers held a 1-point lead —
43 to 42 percent — in September. The odds appeared long even then for
Prop 23, given it was short of 50 percent support that close to the
Nov. 2 vote.
Opposition from Democrats, independents and Latinos to Prop 23 has grown, while support from Republicans has
remained steady since the September poll. “Now that we think
we’re going to win, we really want to have a big, big victory,” said
Jenesse Miller, spokeswoman for the California League of Conservation
Voters. Critics of the initiative want to “send a message
nationally with a big win. That’s the goal at this point,” she said.
The
ballot question — which oil companies are fighting to pass — suspends
the emissions-cutting law until the unemployment rate drops to at least
5.5
percent for one year. That would basically kill the law because the
state’s unemployment rate is above 12
percent, the third highest in the nation.
Kerry campaigns for Boxer, lauds her climate work
Boxer
got some help on the stump from Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), who said Boxer has
“immersed herself in the science and the details and
the minutiae of global climate change,” according to his prepared
remarks. Kerry on Wednesday went to two fundraisers, a veterans event,
Boxer campaign headquarters and did media interviews, a spokeswoman
said.
“She’s a walking encyclopedia of the latest science and
the most detailed policy, and that’s why she’s so respected on climate
change,” Kerry added. “And that’s why she was
the commanding officer in our effort to stand up for science and stand
up for America's energy future.”
NYT front page: Tea Party doubts climate change
“Skepticism and outright denial of global warming are among the articles of faith of the Tea Party movement,” the New York Times reports Thursday.
“For some, it is a matter of religious conviction; for others, it is driven by distrust of those they call the elites. And for others still, efforts to address climate change are seen as a conspiracy to impose world government and a sweeping redistribution of wealth. But all are wary of the Obama administration’s plans to regulate carbon dioxide, a ubiquitous gas, which will require the expansion of government authority into nearly every corner of the economy,” the piece adds.
Oil and tea do mix
The big Times piece looks at the nexus between oil industry groups and the Tea Party movement.
“Groups that help support Tea Party candidates include climate change skepticism in their core message. Americans for Prosperity, a group founded and largely financed by oil industry interests, has sponsored what it calls a Regulation Reality Tour to stir up opposition to climate change legislation and federal regulation of carbon emissions. Its Tea Party talking points describe a cap-and-trade system to reduce carbon emissions as ‘the largest excise tax in history,’” the story notes.
“FreedomWorks, another group supported by the oil industry, helps organize Tea Party rallies and distributes fliers urging opposition to federal climate policy, which it calls a ‘power grab.’”
Interior faces continued pressure on drilling
Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) is making a recess trip to Washington to meet Thursday with Michael Bromwich, who heads the Interior Department’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement.
Gulf Coast lawmakers such as Brady, who represents an oil industry-heavy district, are pressuring Interior to issue permits for deepwater drilling projects now that the formal moratorium has been lifted. They’re also calling for faster action on shallow water projects.
“Bromwich has met with more than 100 federal, state, tribal and local politicians. This includes regular briefings on Capitol Hill, as well as conference calls with members during recess,” Bromwich spokeswoman Melissa Schwartz said.
Bromwich fired a shot across the bow of drilling policy critics earlier this week.
Shallow-water drillers boost lobbying
Offshore drilling companies active in shallow Gulf of Mexico waters have boosted their Washington, D.C., presence since the blowout of BP’s deepwater Macondo well.
New third-quarter federal lobbying reports show the Shallow Water Energy Security Coalition paid the D.C. firm Bracewell & Giuliani $200,000 over the last three months. The coalition, which formed earlier this year, spent $180,000 on second quarter lobbying. They’re concerned with new federal rules and the slowdown in permitting for their operations since the BP catastrophe began.
But the coalition is just one of several oil industry groups and companies that lobby on oil-and-gas policy and spend much more. The American Petroleum Institute — a broader trade group — spent almost $1.3 million on third quarter lobbying, records show.
Judge mandates new review of polar bears and climate change
“A federal judge ordered the Obama administration on Wednesday to review whether polar bears, at risk because of global warming, are endangered under U.S. law,” The Associated Press reports.
“U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan wants the Interior Department to clarify a decision by the administration of former President George W. Bush that polar bears were merely threatened rather than in imminent danger of extinction.”
On tap Thursday III: Conservative panel to chew over bear’s status
The prospect of the polar bears getting Endangered Species Act protections as a result of warming-induced habitat loss has never sat well with conservative groups.
The Heritage Foundation and the Pacific Legal Foundation are hosting a panel discussion on the issue Thursday. “Such a link puts any entity emitting CO2 that could, as the argument goes, harm polar bears squarely in the sites of environmental lawyers. Is such an approach in the best interest of the United States? Does it do anything to protect the polar bears?” Heritage asks.
Speaking of endangered species . . .
Several green groups used the six-month anniversary of the BP oil spill to sue the company over the alleged effects on sea turtles, manatees and other Gulf of Mexico species.
Speaking of BP . . .
The company spent $1.86 million on lobbying over the past three months, according to federal third quarter lobbying reports, up from $1.72 million in the second quarter.
Study: Climate change will be expensive for Gulf Coast
“The U.S. Gulf Coast may face $350 billion in economic damage by 2030 as extreme weather fueled by climate change wreaks havoc on the region, according to a study released today by Entergy Corp.,” Bloomberg reported Wednesday.
“The estimate assumes severe weather similar to Hurricane Katrina — a storm that crippled the region in 2005 — will occur every generation rather than once a century, according to the study by Swiss Re, a Zurich-based reinsurer, and McKinsey & Co., a New York-based research firm. New Orleans-based Entergy, the second-largest U.S. producer of electricity from nuclear reactors behind Exelon Corp., commissioned the report.”
In case missed E2 Wire yesterday
Check out these Wednesday posts:
Grassley slams stimulus energy program following Energy Department report
NRSC mocks Manchin cap-and-trade hunting ad
U.S. reaches $773 million environmental settlement with GM estate, 14 states
Clinton seems poised to approve TransCanada pipeline
China denies reports of rare-earth export cutbacks
Tips, comments or complaints? Please send them to
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
and
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
Follow us on Twitter: @E2wire and @DarrenGoode