|
|
|
May 6, 2010, 12:58 pm
By
Ben Geman
Sens. Kerry and Lieberman appear to be heading toward a climate and energy bill unveiling as soon as next week.
Read more...
Archived under:
E2-Wire
|
|
|
May 6, 2010, 11:35 am
By
Michael O'Brien and Ben Geman
Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) suggested Thursday that a long-anticipated Senate climate and energy bill might not be ready for unveiling yet.
Kerry, who's worked with Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on a compromise bill, was noncommittal on whether it would be rolled out next week.
"We haven't locked it in yet," Kerry told reporters at the Capitol.
When asked what the timeline was, Kerry said, "As soon as we can." Kerry on Wednesday said the bill would be unveiled "very soon."
Read more...
Archived under:
E2-Wire
|
|
May 6, 2010, 11:22 am
By
Ben Geman
Archived under:
E2-Wire
|
May 6, 2010, 10:55 am
By
Jim Snyder
Rep. Nick Rahall, chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, is opening up an investigation into the Gulf oil spill by focusing on whether the system designed to stop oil spills in a catastrophic accident work in deep waters. A number of congressional committees plan to look into the cause of the oil leak a mile below the surface and how to prevent future accidents. Several aides from the Resources Committee have been sent to the Gulf to monitor the government’s and BP’s response to the spill. In a letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, Rahall, a West Virginia Democrat, noted stories in the Wall Street Journal that raise questions about the regulation and operation of “blow-out preventers,” equipment designed to close wells in the result of a catastrophic accident.
Read more...
Archived under:
E2-Wire
|
May 6, 2010, 8:56 am
By
Ben Geman
As we noted Wednesday, several Florida Democrats are pushing for new limits on offshore oil exploration, at least while the federal investigations into the Gulf of Mexico spill are underway.
On the West Coast, there's an effort to go even further.
Several House members from the West Coast want to permanently re-impose the moratoria on offshore drilling there, even though federal plans don’t even contemplate lease sales in Pacific waters. Bans on oil-and-gas leasing along the Atlantic and Pacific Coasts expired in 2008.
From the Congressional Record list of bills introduced Wednesday: By Mr. GARAMENDI (for himself, Mr. FARR, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. SCHRADER, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. WU, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Ms. CHU, Mr. FILNER, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. BAIRD, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. DICKS, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. STARK, and Mr. SCHIFF):
H.R. 5213. A bill to amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit the conduct of offshore drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of California, Oregon, and Washington; to the Committee on Natural Resources.
Archived under:
E2-Wire
|
May 6, 2010, 8:23 am
By
Ben Geman
* Federal and BP planning for oil spills is coming under fire An Associated Press review of Interior Department and BP records turned this up:
“Petrochemical giant BP didn't file a plan to specifically handle a major oil spill from an uncontrolled blowout at its Deepwater Horizon project because the federal agency that regulates offshore rigs changed its rules two years ago to exempt certain projects in the central Gulf region.”
Interior’s Minerals Management Service, which regulates offshore drilling, “says it issued the rule relief because some of the industrywide mandates weren't practical for all of the exploratory and production projects operating in the Gulf region,” the AP continues.
Here’s more from the story:
Read more...
Archived under:
E2-Wire
|
May 5, 2010, 8:32 pm
By
Russell Berman and Ben Geman
Congressional Democrats are pushing their first legislative response to the Gulf Coast oil spill, proposing to vastly raise the cap.
Read more...
Archived under:
Senate, Energy & Environment, E2-Wire
|
May 5, 2010, 7:42 pm
By
Jim Snyder
Even as BP faces withering criticism on Capitol Hill, some lawmakers
are defending offshore drilling in the wake of the massive Gulf of
Mexico oil spill, suggesting that efforts to impose new production
restrictions on the industry won’t come easily.
Read more...
Archived under:
Energy & Environment, Finance & Economy, E2-Wire
|
May 5, 2010, 4:48 pm
By
Ben Geman
House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.) said Wednesday that he may push legislation aimed at preventing future offshore oil spills.
“We need to know exactly what happened before moving forward, but I will not rule out the possibility that remedial legislation may be necessary to ensure that such a disaster is prevented in the future,” he said in a prepared statement on the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
The committee plans to hold two days of hearings (May 26 and May 27) on the spill and the Obama administration’s offshore drilling plans. Rahall’s committee has the main jurisdiction over oil-and-gas development in federal waters.
Read more...
Archived under:
E2-Wire
|
May 5, 2010, 4:42 pm
By
Jordan Fabian
A key Democratic congressman Wednesday expressed reservations with raising the damages cap for oil companies.
Democratic leaders and the White House
want to move on legislation that would change the Oil Pollution Act to
raise the liability ceiling for companies that violate federal
regulations in the wake of a massive oil spill off the coast of
Louisiana caused by an explosion aboard a BP oil rig.
But
Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), who chairs the Energy and Commerce
oversight subcommittee, said Wednesday that the cap should not be
raised just to punish BP.
"Should we look at it?
Yes. Should we discuss it? I don't know if you can retroactively go
back and change it -- punish, if you will, BP," he said in an interview
on Fox News. "I'm not too sure that serves our purpose."
The spill has spurred calls on Capitol Hill to hold oil companies accountable.
Stupak suggested that the existing cap would not effect BP, which
will likely have to pay more than the maximum $75 million if it is
deemed the that company acted with gross negligence. The White House
has expressed confidence the BP's legal liability will exceed the cap. "There
is an exception to that $75 million," he said. "There are a number of
exceptions and outlines, and actually we've looked at the oil
production act, and even as you start to apply to this case in the
Gulf, I think there is enough protections there because it's not just a
flat $75 million."
The spill on the BP rig is the worst
caused by a rig in decades and the explosion killed 11 people and left
several more hospitalized.
Some lawmakers have suggested raising the cap from $75 million to $10 billion.
Investigators are still determining the cause of the spill and continued seepage that is affecting the Louisiana coastline.
Cross-posted to the Briefing Room
Archived under:
E2-Wire
|
|
Energy & Environment News
E2 Wire Most Popular Stories
|
|
Energy & Environment Blog Roll
Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.
|