But the Senate is known to be split on how to proceed with a longer extension. Sen. Dianne FeinsteinDianne FeinsteinOvernight Cybersecurity: Kushner says no collusion, improper contacts with Russia | House poised to vote on Russia sanctions | U.S., Japan to beef up cyber cooperation Feinstein calls for Sessions to appear in front of Senate Judiciary Committee This week: ObamaCare repeal vote looms over Senate MORE (D-Calif.) earlier this year proposed a straight extension, which the Obama administration supports. And Judiciary Committee ranking member Chuck GrassleyChuck GrassleyOvernight Cybersecurity: Kushner says no collusion, improper contacts with Russia | House poised to vote on Russia sanctions | U.S., Japan to beef up cyber cooperation Mattis rips Pentagon officials for M wasted on Afghanistan camouflage Feinstein calls for Sessions to appear in front of Senate Judiciary Committee MORE (R-Iowa) prefers a permanent extension.

While Senate Democrats seem eager to move a longer Patriot Act extension, the House might take a slower road. House Democrats hotly opposed any extension until thorough hearings are held, and Republicans promised to hold hearings during the three-month extension.

The surveillance authorities expire Feb. 28, and the extension approved by the House and Senate would extend that until May 27.

As of Friday morning, President Obama had not signed the extension, but is expected to, possibly over the weekend.