Members have introduced 14 balanced-budget amendments, but only one, H.J.Res. 2, has more than half the members of the House as co-sponsors. This proposal, from Rep. Bob GoodlatteBob GoodlatteSchumer: GOP 'filling the swamp' by targeting ethics chief Justice, FBI to be investigated over Clinton probes Republicans vote to weaken federal regulatory powers MORE (R-Va.), has 241 co-sponsors, including about a dozen Democrats.
Goodlatte also has the second most popular balanced-budget amendment in H.J.Res. 1, which has 133 co-sponsors. Both would prevent the federal government from spending more money than it takes in.
As such, H.J.Res. 1 is more suited to Republicans looking for tough new spending limits, and is much more difficult for Democrats to support.
This distinction is critical, as it will take 290 House votes to approve any amendment to the Constitution. Knowing that H.J.Res. 2 can pick up some support from Democrats could give that proposal favored status as one that has some chance of passage.
But keeping Republicans in line is also an issue. Late last week, Rep. Louie GohmertLouie GohmertGohmert: Dems should be grateful they aren’t being punished for sit-in Ryan reelected Speaker in near-unanimous GOP vote GOP rep: Obama 'exactly wrong on everything' MORE (R-Texas) had tough words for the Republican majority, and said the GOP so far has not been able to cut spending significantly. He then asked that his name be stricken as a co-sponsor of H.J.Res. 2, although he is still a co-sponsor of the tougher version, H.J.Res. 1.
"There are different versions of a balanced-budget amendment," Gohmert said. "One has most of the things we hold dear, not only a requirement of balancing the budget, but also a cap to spending as a percentage of gross domestic product, and also an increased supermajority in order to pass any tax bills raising taxes.
"My concern has been that we had a wave election last November," he added. "We got over 80 new conservative freshmen, and we haven't cut spending like we should. I am more and more compelled that we need a cap on spending."
Also last week, a small group of Republicans led by Rep. Tom McClintock (R-Calif.) put forward their own proposal. That bill, H.J.Res. 84, would make a simple, one-sentence addition to the Constitution:
"The United States government may not increase its debt except for a specific purpose by law adopted by three-fourths of the membership of both houses of Congress."
McClintock argued that a simple approach is best because the Constitution should set forth general guidance that future legislators use to manage specific situations.
"The American Founders recognized Cicero's wisdom that 'the best laws are the simplest ones,' " he said. "And they realized that they couldn't possibly foresee the circumstances and conditions that may confront future generations, and therefore they resisted the temptation to micro-manage every decision that might be made centuries in the future.
"Instead, they set forth general principles of governance and erected a structure in which human nature itself would naturally guide future decisions to comport with those principles," McClintock added.
The Budget Control Act passed by Congress over the summer requires both the House and Senate to vote on a balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution by the end of the year. But unlike what many Republicans were looking for, the Budget Control Act did not condition further increases in the debt on passage of a balanced-budget amendment, and only requires votes to be held.