The Federal Election Commission has just this week confirmed that no presidential candidate to date has opted to participate for the 2012 election, Harper said on the House floor. Mr. Chairman, were talking about eliminating the program that literally no candidate is currently using or preparing to use at this point.

ADVERTISEMENT
That includes President Obama, who in 2008 famously became the first presidential candidate ever to decline to participate in both the primary and general election phases of the program.

Later in the debate, Rep. Jim SensenbrennerJames SensenbrennerHouse panel to hold hearing on online sex trafficking next week Lawmakers grapple with warrantless wiretapping program House panel strikes deal on surveillance reforms MORE (R-Wis.) said the public campaign financing system was already destroyed by Obamas decision to avoid it entirely.

“[Obama] refused to be bound by its restrictions,” Sensenbrenner saidSen. [John] McCain was, and he was put at a significant disadvantage in the general election campaign by running against candidate Obama, who rejected the election campaign funds funds, and raised huge and unlimited amounts of money.

Rep. Louie GohmertLouie GohmertDon't create safe haven for wildlife trafficking — reject SAVES Act You want to recall John McCain? Good luck, it will be impossible Alabama's Roy Moore proves Trumpism is more powerful than Donald Trump MORE (R-Texas) went further by saying Obamas decision to forego public financing should be seen as his support for efforts to do away with the public financing system.

I stand with our president, Barack ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaGeorge W. Bush honors father at benefit for hurricane victims Dem senator: ‘I miss every one of’ our last 5 presidents All five living former presidents appear at hurricane relief benefit concert MORE, on this issue, who found that fund is worthless, its an impediment to getting elected, Gohmert said. So I stand with President Obama in saying, lets get rid of the fund and not use it any more, and let the $200 million in that fund go to something helpful instead of being an impediment to being elected president.

The House is expected to approve Harpers bill to end publicly financed campaigns later Thursday. The bill would also eliminate the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), which Republicans say has outlived its usefulness in ensuring states meet basic voting standards.

Democrats have argued that ending the EAC, put in place after the close and controversial 2000 presidential election, is akin to the Jim Crow laws used decades before to prevent blacks from voting.

The only reason to want to eliminate them is to further suppress votes, Rep. William Lacy Clay (D-Mo.) said of ending both the EAC and public financing of campaigns. The votes are the same groups who were targeted by Jim Crow laws decades ago.

Sensenbrenner rejected that argument.

I cant believe what I just heard from my friend from Missouri, he said, adding that Harpers bill is not a Jim Crow law.

Republicans have said that any remaining needed functions of the EAC can be picked up by the FEC. Harper reiterated that point and added that the the average annual salary at the EAC is $106,000.

— This story was updated at 1:40 p.m. and again at 2:14 p.m.