The House on Tuesday rejected a proposal to limit GOP efforts to review Consumer Financial Protection Bureau spending.

Rep. Gwen MooreGwen Sophia MooreFCC votes to limit program funding internet access for low-income communities More than a dozen lawmakers put family on campaign payroll Freddie, Fannie should offload risk to private insurers MORE's (D-Wis.) amendment to the fiscal 2015 Financial Services appropriations bill would strike a provision that allows for transfers of funds from the Federal Reserve to the CFPB to be reviewed by appropriators.

The amendment was rejected 170-244.

The CFPB, which was created by the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial overhaul, is not funded through the annual appropriations process. Instead, it receives money through transfers from the Federal Reserve.

Moore said it was necessary to keep Congress out of funding for the CFPB so that it would not be subject to politics.

"It is well documented that Congress wanted its funding to be free of political influence when it created the Bureau. In order to protect the consumers, it needed to be free of political influence," Moore said.

But House Republicans have long argued that subjecting the CFPB to the annual appropriations process would increase congressional oversight of the agency. 

"Congressional oversight makes agencies both more responsive and more responsible," said Rep. Ander Crenshaw (R-Fla.), the chairman of the House Appropriations Financial Services subcommittee.

Rep. Jose SerranoJosé Enrique SerranoDem: Hillary right to focus on midterms Lawmakers reflect on where they were on 9/11/01 Dems: Obama must seek vote on ISIS MORE (D-N.Y.), the top Democrat on the House Appropriations Financial Services subcommittee, broke from his colleagues. Serrano warned that the lack of congressional oversight of Wall Street and its enforcement agencies ultimately led to the financial crisis.

"It sounds great for many members to have an agency be on its own and do the right thing. But past history shows us that when we did that, when we did not supervise, and when we did not have oversight, it did just the opposite," Serrano said.