Sens. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) and Mike CrapoMichael (Mike) Dean CrapoOvernight Regulation: Feds push to clarify regs on bump stocks | Interior wants Trump to shrink two more monuments | Navajo Nation sues over monument rollback | FCC won't delay net neutrality vote | Senate panel approves bill easing Dodd-Frank rules Overnight Finance: GOP delays work on funding bill amid conservative demands | Senate panel approves Fed nominee Powell | Dodd-Frank rollback advances | WH disputes report Mueller subpoenaed Trump bank records Senate panel moves forward with bill to roll back Dodd-Frank MORE (R-Idaho) on Wednesday introduced legislation that would remove all references to the word "lunatic" from federal law, a step they said is needed to reflect the country's modern understanding of mental-health conditions.

Conrad said that by eliminating "lunatic" from federal law, the 21st Century Language Act, S. 2367, would help reduce the stigmatization of such conditions.

ADVERTISEMENT
"Recently, a North Dakota constituent contacted my office to express support for legislative efforts to remove this outdated and inappropriate language from federal law," Conrad said Wednesday. "Sen. Crapo and I agree that federal law should reflect the 21st-century understanding of mental illness and disease, and that the continued use of this pejorative term has no place in the U.S. Code."

The word "lunatic" appears in at least one spot in the U.S. Code — in Title 1, Chapter 1, which covers rules of construction. Chapter 1 holds that when determining the meaning of any law, "the words 'insane' and 'insane person' and 'lunatic' shall include every idiot, lunatic, insane person, and person non compos mentis."

Conrad said he and Crapo have worked with the Senate Banking Committee to confirm that eliminating the term "lunatic" would have no impact on federal law, and is supported by many mental-health advocates.

Earlier this month, dozens of groups praised Conrad for proposing the legislation, and said the use of the word in some parts of the U.S. Code serves to "perpetrate this stigmatization" caused by using the "outdated and offensive" term.

More from The Hill:
BoehnerJohn Andrew BoehnerJohn Feehery: A political forest fire Trump's pick for Federal Reserve chief is right choice at right time The two-party system is dying — let’s put it out of its misery MORE-wants-white-house-to-reimburse-taxpayers-for-campaign-costs" mce_href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/223975-boehner-wants-white-house-to-reimburse-taxpayers-for-campaign-costs"> ♦ Boehner: Obama should pay taxpayers for campaign costs
♦ White House: No evidence attack planned to mark bin Laden anniversary
♦ Biden: Obama has 'big stick,' Romney doesn't
♦ Boehner: Obama wants government to 'control the Internet'
♦ EPA official apologizes after comparing his work to crucifixion
Paul RyanPaul Davis RyanMcConnell names Senate GOP tax conferees House Republican: 'I worry about both sides' of the aisle on DACA Overnight Health Care: 3.6M signed up for ObamaCare in first month | Ryan pledges 'entitlement reform' next year | Dems push for more money to fight opioids MORE defends budget to Catholics
♦ Sebelius signals 'doom' if healthcare funds cut for student loan benefit