The most important one for Democrats is an amendment from Reps. Nick RahallNick RahallWest Virginia is no longer Clinton country Solution needed: Rail congestion is stifling economic growth Lobbying World MORE (D-W.Va.) and Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), which would eliminate the core reason for the bill, which is to deem the northern leg of the pipeline as approved.
Two amendments deal with the potential costs of an oil spill. Language from Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) would require TransCanada to submit an oil spill response plan to the governors of each state the pipeline crosses.
Reps. Judy Chu (D-Calif.), Jared Polis (D-Colo.) and Gerry ConnollyGerry ConnollyDemocrats stage protest during brief House session 3 rays of sunshine on Pentagon foreign aid Dem protest ignites debate about control of House cameras MORE (D-Va.) will get debate on language requiring a GAO study on the projected costs of cleanup from a spill.
The Rules Committee also made in order a lone Republican amendment, from Rep. Randy WeberRandy WeberPuerto Rico debt becomes constitutional fight on the right House bill would help veterans get service dogs Louie Gohmert faces his biggest challenge MORE (Texas), that would add language from the State Department saying that Keystone is environmentally safe.
Other Democratic amendments up tomorrow are from:
— Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), adding a finding saying the reliance on oil sands crude would increase greenhouse gas emissions, and preventing the bill from taking effect until these emissions are offset.
— Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), requiring a study on the health impacts of increased air pollution.
— Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), requiring an assessment of how vulnerable the pipeline would be to terrorist attacks, and requiring actions to mitigate those risks.
— Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-Conn.), aimed at ensuring oversight of the pipeline.
— Rep. Sheila Jackson LeeSheila Jackson-LeeDems sustain protest as GOP angles to start recess early House erupts as GOP tries to halt Dems' sit-in House caucus to focus on business in Latin America MORE (D-Texas), allowing a one-year period for filing a legal claim under the act, up from 60 days.