The most important one for Democrats is an amendment from Reps. Nick RahallNick RahallLikely W.Va. Senate GOP rivals spar in radio appearances West Virginia is no longer Clinton country Solution needed: Rail congestion is stifling economic growth MORE (D-W.Va.) and Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), which would eliminate the core reason for the bill, which is to deem the northern leg of the pipeline as approved.

ADVERTISEMENT
Another, from Rep. Rush Holt (D-N.J.), would require all oil transported by the pipeline to be used within the United States. Democrats have argued for years that the pipeline would not make the U.S. more energy independent, and instead would allow Canadian oil to be exported abroad.

Two amendments deal with the potential costs of an oil spill. Language from Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) would require TransCanada to submit an oil spill response plan to the governors of each state the pipeline crosses.

Reps. Judy Chu (D-Calif.), Jared Polis (D-Colo.) and Gerry ConnollyGerry ConnollyBipartisan pair wants commission to oversee Iran deal Dem lawmaker warns of 'political and moral limitations’ to working with Trump Dems ready to deal with Trump — but it's complicated MORE (D-Va.) will get debate on language requiring a GAO study on the projected costs of cleanup from a spill.

The Rules Committee also made in order a lone Republican amendment, from Rep. Randy WeberRandy WeberGOP worries as state Dems outperform in special elections How Republicans split on the Harvey aid, fiscal deal House passes Trump deal on majority Democratic vote MORE (Texas), that would add language from the State Department saying that Keystone is environmentally safe.

Other Democratic amendments up tomorrow are from:

— Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), adding a finding saying the reliance on oil sands crude would increase greenhouse gas emissions, and preventing the bill from taking effect until these emissions are offset.

— Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), requiring a study on the health impacts of increased air pollution.

— Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), requiring an assessment of how vulnerable the pipeline would be to terrorist attacks, and requiring actions to mitigate those risks.

— Rep. Elizabeth Esty (D-Conn.), aimed at ensuring oversight of the pipeline.

— Rep. Sheila Jackson LeeSheila Jackson-LeeAnother Democrat takes a knee on House floor to support NFL protests Black lawmaker kneels on House floor in solidarity with athletes House Judiciary Dems want panel to review gun silencer bill MORE (D-Texas), allowing a one-year period for filing a legal claim under the act, up from 60 days.