The sponsor of the GOP bill, Senate Finance Committee ranking member Orrin HatchOrrin HatchSupreme Court wrestles with corruption law IRS: Annual unpaid tax liability was 8B Hatch asks Treasury for memo that decreases transparency of tax rules MORE (R-Utah), argued on Thursday that bill was a better alternative to the Democratic plan because it would not add to the deficit or raise taxes.
Democrats opposed the legislation for a range of reasons. For example Sen. Jack ReedJack ReedBill would target retaliation against military sexual assault victims Pentagon: Russian military support for Assad remains strong Fears grow about rising US troop levels in Middle East MORE (D-R.I.) said it was two small and was paid for by taking money from other important spending priorities.
"It fails to provide the investments that deal with the infrastructure and jobs crisis we face today," said Reed. "It cuts $40 billion in discretionary funding without addressing the needs of our highway trust fund."
The bill also included a controversial provision that would have delayed several pending Environmental Protection Agency regulations, which drew fire from Democrats, like Sen. Barabara Boxer (D-Calif.)
Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) was the one Republican to break rank and vote against the measure. Likewise, Sen. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinReid: Judiciary a 'rubber stamp' for Trump-McConnell Bill Clinton heckled in W.Va. Pennsylvania Senate rivals use Trump, Clinton as ammunition MORE (D-W.V.) was the one Democrat to break rank and vote for the plan allowing Republican leadership to claim their bill garnered bipartisan support.