Reid says he'll allow a vote on Ayotte's amendment
© Getty Images

Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidThis week: Congress awaits Comey testimony Will Republicans grow a spine and restore democracy? Racial representation: A solution to inequality in the People’s House MORE (D-Nev.) said he would allow a vote on a GOP amendment to a bill that would repeal a $6 billion cut to military pensions.

Later Tuesday, the Senate is expected to adopt a motion to proceed to S. 1963, a bill introduced by Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.). The bill would repeal the $6 billion pension cut from the December 2013 budget deal that has come under harsh criticism. But it currently isn’t paid for.

Several lawmakers have put forward pay-fors. Sen. Kelly AyotteKelly AyotteWeek ahead: Comey firing dominates Washington GOP senators pitch Merrick Garland for FBI director Kelly Ayotte among candidates to be FBI director: report MORE (R-N.H.) has suggested reversing the pension cuts by preventing illegal immigrants from claiming a child tax credit, while some Democrats have targeted offshore tax loopholes, neither of which are likely to be agreed to by the other side.

On Monday, the Senate voted 94-0 to end debate on a motion to proceed to the bill, but Republicans made it clear that they would no longer support the measure unless they were allowed to offer amendments.

“The Ayotte amendment is the one Republicans have indicated they want to vote on and I don’t see any reason why we can’t have a vote on that,” Reid said. Reid has criticized Ayotte’s amendment, saying it will harm children in the United States by preventing their parents from getting a tax credit.

In the budget deal, working-age veterans' cost-of-living retirement benefits would be reduced by one percentage-point below inflation starting in December 2015. The omnibus spending bill corrected the fact that disabled veterans' benefits were also cut, but some lawmakers have argued no current service member or veteran should see a reduction in cost-of-living increases.

Reid said just because the COLA reduction doesn’t take effect for more than a year, “is no reason to delay a solution.”