Senate turns its back on Paul amendment to offer emergency relief from regulators

The question I have for the Senate is, Has your government gotten out of control?’” Paul said. Do we really want to live in a country where you have to count how many barnacles there are before you rebuild a bridge?

ADVERTISEMENT
The Senate did, however, clear a rival amendment offered by Environment and Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) that would express the non-binding sense of the Senate” that agencies ought to work as quickly as possible while implementing all existing laws. 

My amendment instructs the agencies that the Senate supports a speedy process which is already in the law to review and approve projects, Boxer said. Sen. Pauls amendment is a broad overreach that would endanger the safety of the people every senator represents ... It is an overreach. It is radical.

Paul, however, seized on the fact that there is no force of law behind Boxers amendment, dismissing it as say something and do nothing. 

Pauls amendment was actually stopped on a technicality. Democrats objected to it, saying it did not conform to the Budget Act. Paul requested a waiver, which was denied 42-54.

More in Cybersecurity

Senate delays cyber vote, seeking last-minute deal on amendments

Read more »