The opposition was led by Sen. Mary LandrieuMary LandrieuFive unanswered questions after Trump's upset victory Pavlich: O’Keefe a true journalist Trump’s implosion could cost GOP in Louisiana Senate race MORE (D-La.), who argued the bill could reverse many of the hard-won reforms represented in the Dodd-Frank regulatory reform legislation and other reforms made in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis.
Landrieu also said she feared that her Democratic colleagues who support the bill, including Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidSanders and Schumer are right: Ellison for DNC chair The Hill's 12:30 Report Hopes rise for law to expand access to experimental drugs MORE (D-Nev.), were being duped by the bill's moniker.
"So this little innocuous bill flies over from the House with a fancy name talking about jobs, and because we are all desperate, really, to create more jobs we look at the title of the bill, it says ‘jobs’ and we just can't wait to vote for it,” she said.
"Please allow us more time to make some serious changes," she continued.
Landrieu and some other Democrats support an amendment that will also see a vote on Tuesday to "fix and replace" the GOP bill. That amendment, offered by Sen. Jack ReedJack ReedA guide to the committees: Senate Cruz: Supreme Court 'likely' to uphold Trump order Schumer: Trump should see 'handwriting on the wall,' drop order MORE (R.I.), would also help small businesses and entrepreneurs grow by raising capital, but would do so "in a way that protects investors."
For example, one provision would allow smaller companies to raise capital by selling up to $50 million in shares, instead of the current $5 million cap, and replicates the House bill by creating a new category of “Emerging Growth Companies” that would be slowly eased into the regulatory restrictions for a five-year period rather than be entirely absolved.
In addition, the law adds "robust investor protections" to crowd funding and increases the lending authority of the Import Export Bank to $140 billion.