Paul's amendment reads: "To clarify that nothing in the Act shall be construed as a declaration of war or an authorization of the use of force against Iran or Syria."
In justifying his demand for the addition, Paul recalled the war drums beat by senators including John McCainJohn McCainTrump’s minimum wage two-step confuses business groups, advisers Dems fear Trump arguments on terrorism FULL SPEECH: Tim Kaine accepts Democratic VP nomination MORE (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamTrump: 'I hope' Russia is able to get Clinton's emails Syria activists cheer Kaine pick Vulnerable GOP senators praise Kaine MORE (R-S.C.) in the lead-up to President Obama's unilateral decision to participate in NATO's war on Libya, and suggested there are several members of the Senate who are now itching to begin a new conflict abroad.
Reid did not agree to Paul's request for the amendment saying the underlying bill did not even touch the subject of war and to the contrary would provide key diplomatic tools that could prevent a conflict by "preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, threatening Israel and further terrorizing other parts of the world."
"I really am terribly disappointed," said Reid. "There is nothing in the resolution that talks about war, in fact it’s to the contrary. This is not a declaration of war or anything in the neighborhood of that."
The bill, S. 2101, would level broad sanctions at Iran and those who help Iran, including visa denial and freezing of assets on persons and firms that supply Iran with technologies.