The Senate passed legislation reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank on Tuesday after voting down five amendments that would have limited the program's scope and power.
The passage of the bill, in a 78-20 vote, sends the legislation to President Obama, who is expected to sign the reauthorization, which runs through September 2014.
"I’m pleased that Members of Congress from both parties have come together to reauthorize the Export-Import Bank," Obama said in a statement. "This important step will help American businesses create jobs here at home and sell their products around the world — all at no cost to taxpayers."
The reauthorization also ends an unexpectedly long fight on Capitol that divided the Republican Party.
The Export-Import Bank is generally considered a noncontroversial bill, but it came under attack this year from conservatives who argued it was a form of corporate welfare that distorted free trade.
The Club for Growth was among the groups that urged Republicans to oppose reauthorizing the bank’s charter. Ninety-three Republicans voted against the reauthorization in the House, and 19 Republicans voted against it on Tuesday. Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersOvernight Energy: Trump set to sign offshore drilling order Meghan McCain: Obama 'a dirty capitalist like the rest of us' Dems might begin again with Kamala Harris and California MORE (I-Vt.) also voted against the bill.
"We need to end the corporate welfare that distorts the market and feeds crony capitalism," Sen. Mike LeeMike LeeWhat to know about Trump's national monuments executive order ObamaCare must be fixed before it collapses Trump signs order to end 'egregious abuse' of national monuments MORE (R-Utah) said in a floor speech. Lee sponsored one of the amendments that sought to impose restrictions on the bank.
"The corporations that largely benefit from the Ex-Im bank should have no trouble marshaling their resources to compete in today's economy. If they are struggling, then they are most likely not deserving of taxpayer help," Lee said.
Lee’s amendment, which was rejected, would have terminated the bank a year after the reauthorization.
The other amendments would have limited the bank's financing of certain products, stopped the bank from lending to projects in countries that held government debt instruments, funded the bank only if there was progress in talks to end it and kept the bank from funding energy projects that competed with similar projects in the United States, respectively.
Other Republicans defended the bank, saying it was necessary for the United States to compete in the global economy. They noted that other countries have similar state-run enterprises that give their home companies an edge.
"Now it's one thing to reform, it's another thing to unilaterally surrender," Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey GrahamTop admiral: North Korea crisis is 'worst I've seen' Comey to testify before Senate Judiciary Committee Overnight Defense: US moving missile defense system to South Korea | Dems want justification for Syria strike | Army pick pushes back against critics of LGBT record MORE (R-S.C.) said Tuesday. "So to those who would want to end the bank without other countries doing so, I think you would be doing a disservice to this country."
Business groups and conservative groups were similarly divided over renewing the bank, which encourages companies to buy U.S. goods overseas. While the Club for Growth opposed it, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups offered support. Majority Leader Harry ReidHarry ReidDraft House bill ignites new Yucca Mountain fight Week ahead: House to revive Yucca Mountain fight Warren builds her brand with 2020 down the road MORE (D-Nev.) was able to move the legislation toward passage on Monday by agreeing to votes on the five Republican amendments. Reid also agreed to a 60-vote threshold on each amendment as well as the final bill.
Senate Democrats were visibly frustrated at the lengths it took to win passage. On Tuesday Sen. Maria CantwellMaria CantwellUnited explains passenger removal to senators Report: GOP lawmakers selling access to top staffers Bipartisan group demands answers on United incident MORE (D-Wash.) said the five amendments were just the GOP's way of trying to kill the bank all together.
"These amendments that are all trying to gut the Export-Import Bank would send this back to the House when we really, really need to send this to the president's desk," Cantwell said.
Reid and other Senate Democrats grumbled throughout the chamber's consideration of the bill, Tea Party Republicans were holding up legislation that otherwise would have passed quickly.
"As I indicated, in earlier days the Senate would have passed this by unanimous consent as we've done before — this same legislation — but these days the far-right Tea Party wing of the Senate Republican caucus — I used to just talk about the House wing of the Republican caucus, who think that everything has to be a fight," Reid said last week, shortly after Re[publicans blocked an effort to advance the bill.
Reid also repeatedly noted that the reauthorization had Republican support. GOP leaders in the House voted for the reauthorization, for example.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellMitch McConnellSchumer blocks one-week stopgap funding bill Overnight Finance: Dems explore lawsuit against Trump | Full-court press for Trump tax plan | Clock ticks down to spending deadline Hundreds of former EPA employees blast Trump on climate change MORE (R-Ky.) said Tuesday that Republican opposition to reauthorizing the bank had to do with a lack of input from the Senate GOP.
"Give us an opportunity to play a role in the process, and we'll work together on bipartisan solutions," McConnell said. "Just look at the record: When Democrats blocked all debate and amendments on the Export-Import bank legislation, it went nowhere. When they agreed to our reasonable request for input on the bill, that changed. They could've accepted this offer much earlier, but they didn't because it didn't fit the storyline."
—This story was last updated at 6:12 p.m.