Inhofe’s remarks were prompted by a speech Obama gave earlier this summer on carbon pollution. Obama announced that his administration would regulate carbon emissions from power plants in order to improve the air quality and environment within the United States.

ADVERTISEMENT
Inhofe said Obama was trying to enact cap and trade legislation through regulation since a bill couldn’t pass Congress.

He said the regulation would cost the U.S. economy more than $600 billion a year.

“It’s going to cost a lot of money. It would be the largest tax increase ever on America and even if you do it, it won’t lower emissions,” Inhofe said. “So why would they do it? Because there are a lot of liberal who really believe government should control our lives more.”

The Oklahoma senator has argued that climate change is a "hoax."

Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersSanders will 'absolutely' work with Trump to lower prescription drug costs Sanders says he will introduce 'Medicare for all' bill Sunday shows preview: Aftermath of failed healthcare bill MORE (I-Vt.) countered Inhofe's remarks Wednesday.

"I have to say to my good friend Jim InhofeJames InhofeRepeal of Obama drilling rule stalls in the Senate GOP senator: EPA 'brainwashing our kids' A guide to the committees: Senate MORE: he is dead wrong," Sanders said on the Senate floor. "Human activity is causing climate change. … Global warming is real, it is happening right now and it will only get worse if we do not act."

Possibly this week, the Senate will confirm Obama’s nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, Gina McCarthyGina McCarthyEPA chief: ‘Help is on the way’ for farmers Trump moves to kill Obama water rule Obama EPA chief: Pruitt must uphold ‘law and science’ MORE. Inhofe said he wouldn’t vote for McCarthy because she supports and would implement Obama’s proposed regulations.

Republicans agreed to vote on her nomination as part of a deal to avoid Senate rule changes limiting the minorities right to filibuster executive branch nominees.