The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is calling on Sen. Jeff SessionsJeff SessionsSuspended Alabama judge running for Senate Trump and Sessions peddle fear instead of solutions to crime Senate votes to confirm Rosenstein as deputy attorney general MORE (R-Ala.) to recuse himself from voting on his own confirmation for attorney general after a report about information omitted from a questionnaire he submitted.
“Jeff Sessions has fiercely argued in the past that omitting information isn't just wrong, that it may also be illegal,” DNC spokesman Adam Hodge said in a statement.
“So what does he do once he's nominated to be the Attorney General? He omits information from his dark past, particularly when he was deemed too racist to be a federal judge," Hodge added.
“Based on his own reasoning, and in keeping with Senate tradition, Sessions must recuse himself from voting on his own nomination.”
A group of liberal nonprofits, including the Alliance for Justice and People for the American Way, issued a report listing examples of public statements that Sessions did not include in his questionnaire.
The Huffington Post noted that that Sessions had been an outspoken critic of some of President Obama’s nominees for leaving out details in their own questionnaires.
“I want to share a concern that I do have about Judge Sotomayor’s answers to the Senate Judiciary standard questionnaire,” he said in June 2009 during a hearing on then-Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.
“It is still incomplete. I know the administration was very proud to dump a lot of records out in what they call ‘record time,’ but here, two weeks later, we still have some serious gaps in those answers to the committee questions.”
Sen. Dianne FeinsteinDianne FeinsteinTrump, lower court nominees need American Bar Association review This week: Congress returns to government shutdown fight Hotel industry details plans to fight Airbnb MORE (D-Calif.), a member of the judiciary panel, said earlier this month that Sessions’s submission appeared “incomplete,” though she called for more time to review his questionnaire.
“I am sure you would agree that staff must have sufficient time to do the due diligence on any nominee for this vital position—and this due diligence will likely take longer than the review for recent, prior nominees who had less materials to analyze,” Feinstein wrote in a letter to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa).
“Second, despite being voluminous, Senator Sessions’ production appears to have been put together in haste and is, on its face, incomplete,” she added.
Updated: 9:03 p.m.