THE HILL
 
comment
Print

Insurance commissioners weigh medical loss ratio definitions

By Julian Pecquet - 08/10/10 03:32 PM ET

A new draft document outlines some of the outstanding issues state insurance commissioners need to resolve concerning the medical loss ratio.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners begins its annual meeting in Seattle this week, and one of its highest-profile tasks will be defining what should count as medical care and what shouldn't.

The 20-page document outlines outstanding questions, including:

• Should incurred claims and earned premiums used in the calculation of Medical Loss Ratio for rebate calculations be on a net of reinsurance basis?

• Should the experience for a multi-state employer be included in the policy issue state or apportioned among the states with enrollees?

• Should new business with less than 12 months of experience be excluded from the MLR calculation?

• Should the change in reserves for future contingent benefits and lawsuits be included in the definition of incurred claims?

• How should rebates be handled if they don't meet minimum thresholds?

• Which enrollees are eligible for rebates in the case of averaged experience years?

The draft is accessible at http://bit.ly/99MElS.



Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/health-reform-implementation/113593-insurance-commissioners-weigh-medical-loss-ratio-definitions

More Videos »

On The Money Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.