THE HILL
 
comment
Print

Politicians urged to stay out of NIH grant process

By Julian Pecquet - 07/26/11 03:24 PM ET

A coalition of researchers and other stakeholders wrote to appropriators Tuesday urging them to continue funding scientific research at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and leave politics out of the review process.

The letter from the Coalition to Promote Research comes as some conservatives are clamoring for a moratorium on NIH grant-making and an investigation into the research that is approved.

"Congressional decisions rescinding funding for individual grants that have been approved through NIH's process not only undermines the integrity of the world's premiere scientific enterprise, but also the work of our nation's top scientists, and ultimately, the public's health," reads the letter to Appropriations subcommittee Chairman Denny Rehberg (R-Mont.) and ranking member Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.).

Separately, the coalition has put together a six-page primer defending the rationale for research that came under fire from the Traditional Values Coalition last week. Some of the research involves homosexual behavior.

"The development of effective interventions for HIV/AIDS prevention depends on a scientific foundation of biomedical research as well as behavioral research that identifies the psychological, social and cultural causes of risk-taking behaviors and the mechanisms that facilitate behavioral change," reads the scientific justification for research regarding penis size and risky behavior among gay men.

Meanwhile, the Traditional Values Coalition on Tuesday highlighted a new batch of NIH grants it deems questionable. This time they focus on research in China that could appear to offer little direct value to U.S. taxpayers.

"As our country heads to fiscal ruin, why are we giving millions in taxpayer dollars to Chinese science — which benefits China and its institutions — when they hold more than $1 trillion in American debt?" coalition President Andrea Lafferty said in a statement. "It is good to fund certain types of medical research, provided it benefits those who pay for it — the American taxpayer. It is simply unacceptable for the NIH to pay Chinese researchers to study acupuncture, or fund international research, when we are struggling to pay our own debts. That China, our biggest creditor, is the recipient makes this waste all the more incredible."

The NIH says Americans "benefit enormously from research that has taken place elsewhere."

"In this increasingly 'flat' world, health issues affect us all," the NIH told The Hill. "Diseases don’t respect borders. Globalization has increased the movement of people and products around the world so diseases can spread more quickly."

Diseases now plaguing China — including diabetes, cancer, heart disease and dementia — "also touch virtually every American family in some way," the NIH said. "International collaborations to study these diseases can speed knowledge on how to treat and prevent them around the world.

"NIH also funds training of the next generation of researchers in global health, both foreign and U.S. scientists, including new investigators to build the scientific research pipeline and meet the research priorities of both the U.S. and collaborators abroad."


—This post was updated at 4:15 p.m. with reaction from the NIH.


Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/public-global-health/173621-researchers-defend-nih-grant-process

More Videos »

On The Money Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.