feed-image Healthwatch - The Hill's Healthwatch Feed »
  September 23, 2010, 6:00 am

Healthcare Thursday

By Mike Lillis

Wednesday was just the warm up: President Obama introduced it yesterday, but it's Thursday — the six month anniversary of health reform passage — that the Patient's Bill of Rights takes effect. It won't go down with a whimper.

Health Care for America Now (HCAN), a liberal supporter of the reform law, is hosting a slew of nationwide gatherings designed to explain the insurance reforms to a public that remains skeptical of the law's benefits. Venues will range from churches and universities to L.A.'s Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

"Polls show that the more people know about the [reform law], the more they support it," reads an HCAN release.

The Patient's Bill of Rights — a central component of the reform law — will ban insurance companies from denying coverage for sick kids; prohibit insurers from using technical errors to drop coverage when patients get sick; and prevent plans from setting lifetime dollar limits on coverage. 

The law will also allow young adults to remain under their parents' coverage up to age 26, and require all new plans to cover a minimum set of preventive care services. http://nyti.ms/cgzS5i

Don't try to convince John Boehner: The House minority leader issued a statement Wednesday saying the reform bill "represents everything that’s gone wrong with our government." 

Read more...
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  September 22, 2010, 6:43 pm

Coburn again objects to food safety bill, offers alternative

By Julian Pecquet


Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) again delayed passage of food safety legislation on Wednesday but offered his own, paid-for alternative.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) had asked for unanimous consent on a bipartisan agreement worked out by the Senate HELP Committee, incorporating amendments exempting small farmers and restrictions on the use of the Bisphenol-A chemical in food and beverage containers. Coburn objected but said he'd approve an alternative that appropriates rather than authorizes money for the bill and does not include the Bisphenol-A restrictions, sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)

Reid said he'd think about it.

"Because this is something I had not anticipated," Reid said on the floor, "I will withdraw my [unanimous consent] request and I will renew it at a later time if I can come to something that's more appropriate."

A Senate Democratic staffer said Reid is unlikely to agree since the underlying bill was worked out between the two parties. If the Senate can't pass food safety by unanimous consent, it's unlikely to have time to come to the floor for debate before the mid-term elections.

The legislation would give FDA the power to recall tainted food, quarantine geographical areas and access food producers’ records. The House passed its version of food safety in July 2009.


comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  September 22, 2010, 4:27 pm

House passes Medicare fraud bill

By Julian Pecquet

The House on Wednesday passed a bipartisan bill that allows the Department of Health and Human Services to ban corporate executives from doing business with Medicare if their companies were convicted of fraud, even if the conviction takes place after their departure.

The bill was introduced by the Ways and Means health panel's chairman and ranking member, Reps. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) and Wally Herger (R-Calif.). The bill is one of about a dozen health-related bills the House is taking up Wednesday afternoon under an expedited process known as suspension.

The Congressional Budget Office released a score for the bill on Wednesday. 

"CBO expects the bill would result in the exclusion of few individuals who would not be excluded under current law," the score says, but although "enacting this legislation could affect direct spending for Medicare and Medicaid" it would have "no significant budgetary impact."

comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  September 22, 2010, 3:29 pm

Iowa requests waiver from medical loss ratio requirement

By Julian Pecquet

Iowa has asked federal regulators to give its individual market health plans until 2014 to comply with the healthcare reform law's medical loss ratio requirement. The law requires the plans to spend at least 80 percent of premiums on care starting next year.

"Iowa enjoys some of the lowest health insurance rates in the country," Iowa Insurance Commissioner Susan Voss writes in a letter sent Tuesday to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. "And our market provides for not only one very large health insurance carrier, but several small insurance carriers as well in the individual market. Already we are seeing several of our carriers with small numbers of insureds in the individual market announce their intent to cease business in our state.  This will impact the choices available to Iowa consumers."

Smaller carriers, Voss adds, "will not meet the initial 80% medical loss ratio factor in 2011.  They will need a phase-in period.  Without such a waiver provision, I believe the federal standard will disrupt our individual health insurance market. This in turn will negatively impact many Iowans who have enjoyed their coverage benefits through these smaller carriers."

Maine asked for a waiver from the medical loss ratio requirement in July.

Several other states are believed to be considering a similar request.

comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  September 22, 2010, 3:00 pm

Federal regulators asked to allow medical loss ratio phase-in

By Julian Pecquet

Members of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners met with Obama administration officials to discuss provisions of the healthcare law.

Read more...
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  September 22, 2010, 1:54 pm

Enzi demands do-over on healthcare grandfathering clause

By Julian Pecquet

Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) on Wednesday began urging his colleagues to demand a vote on a resolution of disapproval to overturn the grandfathering clause of the healthcare reform law.

The provision exempts existing employer-sponsored plans from a number of provisions in the new law, such as having to offer benefits without cost-sharing. But some business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, argue that the grandfathering regulations are too strict and would lead to many employers losing their right to offer their current plans.

"Throughout the health care debate, the President continually promised, 'If you like what you have you can keep it'," Enzi said in a statement. "The grandfathered health plan rule breaks the President’s promise."

An Enzi spokesman clarified that the senator wants federal regulators to revisit the grandfathering clause and make it "better tailored to the needs and demands of small businesses."

The Department of Health and Human Services released preliminary regulations in June. They state that plans would lose their grandfathered status if coinsurance and copayments increase more than a specified amount, for example.

According to HHS estimates:

_ 40 percent to 67 percent of individual policies will lose grandfathered status by 2011;

_ 34 percent to 64 percent of large employer group plans (100 or more employees) will lose their grandfathered status by 2013: and

_ 49 percent to 80 percent of small employer group plans (three to 99 employees) will lose their grandfathered status by 2013.

comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  September 22, 2010, 1:33 pm

Obama touts patient protections in health reform law

By Mike Lillis

President Obama on Wednesday welcomed the arrival of some of the most significant and widely anticipated insurance reforms in the Democrats' new healthcare law: the Patient's Bill of Rights.

Those protections — which take effect Thursday, six months after the law passed — represent "the most important patient's bill of rights that we've ever seen in our history," Obama told a small backyard audience in Falls Church, Va., just outside of Washington.

Read more...

comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  September 22, 2010, 12:10 pm

Lawmakers and advocates fight for mental health parity

By Julian Pecquet

Lawmakers and mental health advocates said Wednesday that the U.S. has a long way to go before mental and physical health are treated on an even keel.

They called on Congress to pass several pending bills and on federal regulators to implement the new healthcare reform law with an eye towards mental health parity. The comments came during a policy forum sponsored by AstraZeneca and hosted by The Hill.

Rep. Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.), a first-term congressman who helped pass a mental health parity law in Albany, said there were "four keys to a successful implementation of healthcare reform for the mentally ill and for people with serious addiction disorders":

- The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services "must mount a vigorous outreach and enrollment program";

- Regulators must ensure parity in state exchanges and Medicaid and quickly issue guidance regarding parity in Medicare managed care plans;

- Intensive community based services and residential addiction services should be included in the mandatory minimum benefits package offered through the new state exchanges;

- Community mental health centers must be part of every medical home funded via the law's Health Home State Option.

Tonko also raised the issue of Medicare reimbursement cuts to psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers, and with state budget cuts for mental health programs.

Rep. Tim Murphy (R-Pa.), a child psychologist, pressed for passage of legislation that would extend federal health information technology incentives to behavioral health services. The legislation, introduced by Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.), would make behavioral and mental health providers eligible for federal grants to acquire electronic health records that are interoperable, integrated, intelligent and easy to use.

But bills improving access to mental health services "only matter if we make sure we integrate care together," Murphy said. "Mental health services are not stand-alone and that is something we need to continue to educate the community around."

Murphy also said his bill extending federal medical liability protections to volunteers at community health centers might come up for a vote Wednesday.

Linda Rosenberg, the president and CEO of the National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare, also pressed for passage of Kennedy's bill and for "vigilance in ensuring that the Affordable Care Act’s Health Home State Option meets the needs of people with serious mental illness."

She also requested support for the Community Mental Health and Addiction Safety Net Equity Act, which would replace community mental health centers with Federally Qualified Behavioral Health Centers - entities designed to serve individuals with serious mental illnesses and addiction disorders. The bill, introduced by Rep. Doris Matsui (D-Calif.), has six co-sponsors.

comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  September 22, 2010, 10:31 am

Health plans granted delay on appeals provision of reform law

By Julian Pecquet

Federal regulators have agreed to give some health plans until July 1, 2011, to comply with internal appeals and external review rules set to go into effect Thursday.

New "safe harbor" guidance from the departments of Labor and Health and Human Services delays enforcement action against group health plans and health insurance issuers in the group or individual market who are "acting in good faith" to implement the new rules, created by the healthcare reform act. The plans, according to a memo to members of America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP), must show they are doing their best to: 

  • respond to urgent-care claims within 24 hours after receipt of the claim; 
  • provide notices in a "culturally and linguistically appropriate" manner;
  • include diagnosis and procedure codes and other content on notices of adverse determination; and
  • allow claimants to initiate external review or legal action if the plan or insurer fails to strictly adhere to all requirements.

AHIP had requested the safe harbor out of concern that health plans would face "significant challenges" in complying with the new rules by Thursday. 

In addition, the new guidance also addresses grandfathered plans, dependent coverage for children up to age 26 and coverage for out-of-network emergency services.

comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
  September 22, 2010, 6:00 am

Pelosi: Health reform will be an advantage for Dems in election

By Michael O'Brien

The healthcare reform bill passed into law earlier this year is "definitely an advantage" to Democrats at the polls this fall, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) asserted.

Pelosi, who helped shepherd the legislation through the House earlier this year, expressed confidence that the bill would be an asset to Democrats in the next 41 days before the midterm congressional elections.

"It is definitely an advantage for us, because we have aligned ourselves with those who passed Social Security, Medicare and now healthcare for all Americans, not as a right, but a privilege," Pelosi said in an interview aired Tuesday evening on NPR to mark the six-month anniversary of the reform bill becoming law.

Republicans have made the healthcare bill a centerpiece of their election-year messaging, promising to repeal parts or all of the legislation and replace it with different reform.

Some Democrats, for their part, have grown more wary of the law and focused their messaging on the economy and jobs. One vulnerable incumbent, Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), a supporter of the bill, suggested that the focus on healthcare might have been a "distraction." Another centrist Democrat, Rep. Gene Taylor (Miss.), became the first member of his party to join with Republicans to back repealing the legislation.

When it comes to repeal, Democrats have used the GOP pledge to "repeal and replace" as a cudgel against Republican incumbents and candidates by highlighting popular reforms in the bill that would be threatened by a repeal.

Pelosi conceded that Republicans might have done a better job, at times, of setting the message about the bill, but said Democrats would be strengthened by running with the legislation.

"So some aspects of the bill are popular with the public. The Republicans, always the handmaidens of the special interests, have long beat the drum about what this bill is not about, and we have not made up that part of the debate," she said. "But we are proud of it, and our members gain strength from their support of it. We think it will be a very positive factor in the election."

But polls show the public is still very mixed about the legislation. The Kaiser Health Foundation, which has tracked public opinion about the law, found that opposition to it had ticked upward by the end of August. Forty-five percent of Americans now have an unfavorable opinion of the legislation, the poll found, while 43 percent have a favorable view of the law.

comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
« Start< Prev571572573574575576577578579580Next >End »
 

More Videos »

On The Money Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.