THE HILL
 
comment
Print

GPO looks for savings, asks lawmakers to opt out of receiving print publications

By Debbie Siegelbaum - 05/11/11 05:34 PM ET

Lawmakers are being given the choice to opt out of receiving print copies of daily and permanent editions of Congressional and Federal publications as the Government Printing Office looks to reduce unnecessary printing and wasteful spending.
 
The GPO is currently conducting a survey across Congressional offices to see how many, if any, would be willing to cease receiving paper copies of the Congressional Record and Federal Register, among other publications.
 
“We’re doing a survey to see who wants the Record,” said William Boarman, Public Printer of the United States, in testimony Wednesday before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on the Legislative Branch.
 
“Obviously, if a number of members opt out, that’s going to create a savings right away and may change the way we actually do business,” he added.
 
The survey has reportedly been undertaken at the behest of the Committee on House Administration to identify efficiencies in the GPO, according to a committee staff member.
 
Last week, committee chairman Rep. Dan Lungren (R-Calif.) and Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Ga.), chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight, circulated a “Dear Colleague” letter encouraging lawmakers to opt out of receiving paper publications.  
“It costs taxpayers approximately $1,300,000 from the Congressional Printing and Binding fund to print the daily and permanent editions of Congressional and Federal publications for Member offices each year,” according to the notice.
 
Though members are entitled to these publications, many copies go unutilized and are available online through the GPO’s Federal Digital System as well as the Library of Congress’s THOMAS information system, the notice added.
 
Opting out of such publications could save taxpayers nearly $3,000 per member office each year, the committee estimated. As such, “in an effort to eliminate the unnecessary printing of periodic material and cut superfluous spending,” each member office was encouraged to visit an online survey and opt out.
 
More than 140 member offices have opted out to date, said a committee staffer. The GPO expects the full results of the survey May 18.
 
The House is looking for other ways to identify efficiencies within the GPO, as well. The agency’s fiscal year 2012 budget request now stands at more than $148 million, a reduction of $5.2 million from the amount requested last year.
 
In Wednesday’s hearing on the GPO’s budget request, House Appropriations Legislative Branch subcommittee chairman Rep. Ander Crenshaw (R-Fla.) questioned Boarman on where the GPO could find further savings.
 
According to Boarman, GPO overhead has increased by almost 50 percent over the last four years, and an estimated 33 cents of every dollar in GPO funding goes towards other duties including unfunded requirements.
 
One significant financial drain for the GPO is maintaining the aging buildings they reside in, some nearly 100 years old.
 
Calling that expense “enormous,” Boarman said that the GPO has shrunk from 8,000 employees 35 years ago to 2,200 today. This has left them with up to 100,000 square feet of extra space that could be reorganized and allocated to the Architect of the Capitol and other Congressional functions within the next two years.
 
In addition, Boarman would like to see the GPO police force merged with the Capitol Police, a move similar to that performed by the Library of Congress.
 
“I’m in the printing and publishing and electronic business; I shouldn’t be in the security business,” Boarman said, testifying that the GPO spends roughly $13 million each year on security.
 
After Boarman appeared before the subcommittee Wednesday afternoon to discuss the issues and challenges faced by the GPO, Gingrey issued a statement calling for modernization of the agency.
 
“The GPO must be more aggressive in adapting to the informational needs of the 21st century,” he wrote.
 
“Judging solely by the overwhelming reaction we’ve had from member offices voluntarily reducing the number of printed documents they have traditionally received from GPO, the House is obviously ready and able to work with the GPO as it modernizes its operations to cut costs and promote efficiency,” Gingrey added.



Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/appropriations/160641-gpo-looks-for-savings-asks-lawmakers-to-opt-out-of-receiving-print-publications

More Videos »

On The Money Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.