One of the four Senate
Republicans to help Democrats pass their financial regulatory reform overhaul
indicated Friday that he has serious doubts about the final version.
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa),
through a spokeswoman, told the Wall Street
Journal that he has concerns about one of the funding sources for
the sweeping legislation:
If Mr. Grassley decides to
vote against the bill, Democrats would be left with little margin for error
when they bring the bill to the Senate floor, which could happen as soon as
next week. Mr. Grassley was one of four Republicans to support an earlier
version of the bill when it narrowly passed the Senate in May.
Democrats and White House
officials likely need the support of at least two Republicans to secure the 60
votes necessary to block a potential filibuster.
[snip]
Mr. Grassley’s spokeswoman,
Jill Kozeny, said he is “very concerned about the precedent of using the FDIC
fees both as a credit to the FDIC and to count as [a way to pay for the bill],
and it’s his view that TARP money ought to be used to pay down the debt and not
for more spending.”
Ms. Kozeny didn’t say whether
Mr. Grassley had made up his mind on how to vote.
The Senate is expected to
make its final vote on the conference report next week, which would send the
legislation to President Barack Obama’s desk. The financial reform effort is
one of the White House’s top legislative priorities.
With the death of Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) and the appointment of his replacement up in the air, the Senate vote on the Wall Street bill has become uncertain.
The House passed the
conference report just before Congress broke for the July 4 recess last week
after the conference was reopened to alter a $19 billion bank tax that key
Republicans, such as Susan Collins (Maine) and Scott Brown (Mass.), said could
prevent them from voting for the bill.
Collins had said she is now leaning toward supporting the bill,
and Brown said that he is taking the recess period to study the final
language.
Cross-posted from Blog Briefing Room.