Corporate Governance

  April 29, 2010, 6:14 pm

Union claims Disclose Act falls short

By Jay Heflin

Legislation introduced in the House and Senate requiring greater disclosure of how campaign funds are spent falls short, said Anna Burger, Secretary-Treasurer at the Service Employees International Union. 


Read more...

Archived under: Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 29, 2010, 2:19 pm

U.S. Chamber blasts motivation of Disclose Act

By Vicki Needham

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce blasted a bill calling for the disclosure of all campaign ad sponsors, saying the measure would stifle free speech and help Democrats in the upcoming elections. 

House and Senate Democrats unveiled legislation Thursday that would require disclosure of the top five organizations making contributions to the ad and any sponsor donating more than $1,000 would be reported to the Federal Election Commission within 24 hours of the money being spent. 

"What's most in need of disclosure is the real purpose behind this bill -- it's nothing more than a brazen attempt to tilt the playing field in favor of the incumbent party in this fall's elections, silence constitutionally protected speech and abridge First Amendment rights," said Tom Donohue, chamber president and CEO, said in a statement.

Donohue called it a "sad day" that bill sponsors Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) and Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) are putting "politics before the people's business," focusing on the fall elections rather than job creation. 

"This response is what you would expect from powerful special interests frantically working to defend their shadowy influence over our democracy and elections," Doug Thornell, spokesman for Van Hollen, told The Hill. 

"I'm not sure what their problem is with transparency, but clearly they are uncomfortable operating in sunlight." 

Archived under: Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 29, 2010, 2:02 pm

Obama applauds lawmakers on Disclose Act

By Jay Heflin

President Obama on Thursday congratulated lawmakers for introducing legislation that requires fuller disclosure on how campaign funds are spent.

Read more...
Archived under: Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 29, 2010, 1:12 pm

Van Hollen unveils companion bill to Schumer's Disclose Act

By Administrator

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) on Thursday introduced the House counterpart to Senate legislation that requires greater disclosure on campaign funding.

Read more...
Archived under: Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 29, 2010, 10:24 am

Schumer unveils campaign disclosure bill

By Administrator

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) joined 3 fellow Democrats on Thursday to introduce legislation requiring greater disclosure on campaign funding. They hope the bill will pass Congress by July 4 and be enacted before the midterm election.

The DISCLOSE Act targets leaders of labor unions, advocacy organizations and corporations that run campaign ads by requiring them to appear at the end of the commercial and announce that they sponsored the ad. 

The top 5 organizations that donated to the ad would also be disclosed and contributions over $1,000 would be reported to the Federal Election Commission within 24 hours of the money is spent. 

Read more...
Archived under: Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 28, 2010, 7:18 pm

Grassley criticizes GM loan repayment with bailout funds

By Vicki Needham

A leading Republican renewed his criticisms Wednesday about General Motors use of federal bailout funds to repay a $6.7 billion loan. 

Senate Finance ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) complained that GM shouldn't have been permitted take funds from an escrow account created by the Troubled Asset Relief Program and it should clearly disclose that the federal government owns 61 percent of the company. 

Grassley said today that the Treasury Department confirmed that GM used escrowed funds calling it "an elaborate TARP money shuffle.

"The bottom line is that the repayment was made on the dime of taxpayers across America," Grassley said today on the floor. "It's misleading to say that GM repaid its TARP loans 'in full, with interest, ahead of schedule, because more customers are buying' GM cars.' "

Read more...
Archived under: Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 28, 2010, 6:57 pm

Van Hollen to intro bill responding to Citizens United case tomorrow

By Jay Heflin

Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Ma.), the Assistant to the Speaker, will join Reps. Mike Castle (R-Del.), Walter Jones (R-N.C.) and Robert Brady (D-Penn.) on Thursday to introduce a legislative response to the Supreme Court's ruling on the Citizens United case. 

The court decision removed some of the restrictions on campaign spending by corporations and unions, allowing them to spend unlimited funds on election activities to expressly advocate for or against a candidate's election.

The DISCLOSE Act, as it is called, will require certain organizations to disclose their donors, which could include trade groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 

Archived under: Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 25, 2010, 11:36 am

Summers: Bad policies came from Bush era, not the Clinton era

By Ian Swanson

President Barack Obama’s chief economic adviser on Sunday offered a defense of Clinton administration policies deregulating Wall Street’s rules.

Read more...
Archived under: Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 24, 2010, 12:32 pm

Goldman Sachs e-mails suggest firm profited from mortgage crisis

By Ian Swanson

Sen. Carl Levin said the e-mails show Goldman “made a lot of money by betting against the mortgage market.”

Read more...
Archived under: Senate, Finance & Economy, Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
  April 22, 2010, 9:36 am

Poll shows strong opposition to Citizens ruling

By Jay Heflin

A nationwide poll from Quinnipiac found that 79 percent of respondents disapprove of the recent Supreme Court ruling on the Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission case.

The Court essentially ruled that corporations and unions are entitled to free speech and, therefore, could contribute funds directly to a political candidate. Opposition to this decision was strong across the political spectrum, according to the poll.

The poll also found that 78 percent of voters think the Court allows political views to enter into their decisions.  Read more...

Archived under: Corporate Governance
comment Comments
E-mail Print share
 
« Start< Prev2122232425Next >End »
 

More Videos »

On The Money Twitter - Click to follow
More From The Web
bloglogo

More Briefing Room »

More Congress Blog »

More Pundits Blog »

More Twitter Room »

More Hillicon Valley »

More E2-Wire (Energy) »

More Ballot Box »

More On The Money »

More Healthwatch »

More Floor Action »

More Transportation »

More DEFCON Hill »

More Global Affairs »

More In The Know »

More RegWatch »

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.