feed-image Pundits Blog - The Hill's Pundits Blog Feed »
  February 9, 2010, 10:35 am

The Southeastern Toyota bullies: Should you buy a car from these people?

By Bob Franken

Let's be blunt. One hundred and seventy-three Toyota dealers in the United States are plainly, simply un-American. They are the members of an association that covers five Southeastern states, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, North Carolina and South Carolina, that have decided to pull their advertising from ABC affiliates in their coverage area. Why? Because ABC news has been giving what they've determined to be "excessive stories on the Toyota issues.” As I said, un-American.

Read more...
Archived under: Transportation
comment (0)
E-mail Print share
 
  February 8, 2010, 3:45 pm

John Murtha

By John Feehery

John Murtha was one of those guys whose influence didn’t really translate that well in today’s media culture.

He was a rock-ribbed former Marine who had two key objectives in his congressional career: support the troops and take care of his district.

He attracted his fair share of controversy in his time. He was implicated in the infamous Ab-Scam controversy in the late 1970s. He was caught on tape thinking very carefully about a possible bribe attempt from an FBI agent posing as a Arab sheik. He narrowly escaped prosecution in a scandal that netted several politicians.

Read more...
Archived under: Lawmaker News
comment (7)
E-mail Print share
 
  February 8, 2010, 2:48 pm

'Retarded'

By A.B. Stoddard

Sarah Palin gave a great speech Saturday night in Nashville at the Tea Party convention. She is preparing to engage on a national level in a significant way, on Fox News, campaigning in primaries and possibly general-election campaigns this fall and staying on the speaking tour. According to Sunday's New York Times, Palin has created a circle of advisers who probably wrote that speech and keep her informed on the issues of the day. She is admittedly prepping herself for a new role: someone prepared to talk about policy, not just about herself.

Read more...
Archived under: National Party News
comment (6)
E-mail Print share
 
  February 8, 2010, 11:13 am

Palin seeks divine intervention

By Bill Press

They paid Sarah Palin $100,000 — for what?

If I were the organizers of that event — or one of the “grassroots” teabaggers who shelled out $349 for a steak-and-lobster dinner — I’d demand my money back.

For 45 minutes, all Palin did was string together a lame collection of clichés and cheap shots, without offering one idea of her own. Three times, she called for “common-sense conservative solutions to problems” — without suggesting even one of them.

Read more...
Archived under: National Party News
comment (13)
E-mail Print share
 
  February 8, 2010, 10:54 am

The big snow: Huddled masses yearning to be freed

By Bob Franken

No heart attack from digging out. That was a good thing, but there was little to do but spend the weekend mostly hunkered down inside. There were no newspapers, no delivery, but who missed them? We could read them just as easily online. And then, those of us who didn't lose power had plenty of TV to help pass the time.

As the anchors and frozen reporters repeated ad nauseam what we already knew, that it sucked outside, it would not have been much of a surprise to see a crawl at the top or bottom of the screen informing that the meeting of the Global Warming Action Group had been canceled. But the weather coverage was just one of the highlights.

Read more...
Archived under: Healthcare, Media, Sports & Entertainment, The Administration, Washington Metro News
comment (1)
E-mail Print share
 
  February 8, 2010, 9:46 am

Sarah Palin at Opryland: Rise of the ‘new federalism’

By Bernie Quigley

Sarah Palin’s speech to the Tea Party Convention at Nashville brought to my mind the Newport Folk Festival in 1963, when Doc Watson and Bob Dylan were just anybody. It was raw and unpretentious, unformed and unscripted, informal and from the heart, but the beginning of something purely original and of vast and natural willfulness which appears to just now be awakened and will not be held back.

Read more...
Archived under: National Party News
comment (5)
E-mail Print share
 
  February 8, 2010, 9:05 am

Obama’s inappropriate interview at the Super Bowl

By Bernie Quigley

The Tea Party Convention in Nashville on Saturday night was funky and alive. And what a contrast to the formulaic and phony interview with President Barack Obama — a government/network joint-venture infomercial really — that Katie Couric and CBS interjected inappropriately into the Super Bowl pre-game programming.

Read more...
Archived under: Sports & Entertainment
comment (11)
E-mail Print share
 
  February 8, 2010, 8:58 am

Bill Clinton to the rescue?

By Carol Felsenthal

When I was writing Clinton in Exile: A President Out of the White House, I spent many hours interviewing physicians about the work Bill Clinton was doing, mostly in Africa, and mostly, at that time, helping to bring down the cost of drugs used to treat HIV-positive children. No matter what one thinks about Bill Clinton, it was good, necessary and effective work. And if he continues with it — one of the smartest of the physicians I interviewed told me that he is always worried that Clinton’s interest will wane and that he’ll find something flashier on which to focus — he might even win that Nobel peace prize he so covets.

Read more...
Archived under: International Affairs, The Administration
comment (12)
E-mail Print share
 
  February 8, 2010, 8:51 am

Rate of job loss, Bush v Obama (fact checked)

By Craig Newmark

UPDATE: just got factchecked, report and raw data

(Courtesy of howardweaver)

63384623-6ce3dcb6861de4ad3d8c82313b68e186.4b6ddf78-scaled

Archived under: Economy & Budget
comment (3)
E-mail Print share
 
  February 8, 2010, 8:45 am

Another take on the court's ruling

By Lanny Davis

In last week's column in The Hill, I admitted that I felt conflicted about the Supreme Court's important decision in the Citizens United Supreme Court case, which overturned a portion of the McCain-Feingold law that banned corporate advocacy ads before federal elections. I referred to my long-held beliefs that the First Amendment protection on speech — whether by a real "person" or a "corporation," defined as a person under the law — but also to my concerns that the Citizens United decision would unleash excessive cash into politically partisan advocacy by both corporations and unions. I also supported transparency for all who fund such advocacy as one way to mitigate the adverse consequences of the decision.

Read more...
Archived under: The Judiciary
comment (0)
E-mail Print share
 
12345678910Next >End »
VISIT THE HILL'S HOMEPAGE FOR THE LATEST ON CONGRESS ››
 
You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.