I can accurately document the origins of the recent states rights and separatist movements in America with the entry of Bill ClintonBill ClintonStein: Al Gore needs to 'step up' on climate change Overnight Finance: Trump adviser softens tone on NAFTA | Funding bill to be released Tuesday | GOP leader won't back Trump tariff plan Press: You can’t blame Bernie MORE into national politics. There seemed something wrong with it. There still does.
And Newt became the anti-Clinton. He still is. And he is a strong force still. Probably he alone of those who stood on stage at the debates is warrior. He dominated the debates when he chose to and brought their few stellar moments.
The Wall Street Journal's Dorothy Rabinowitz wrote of the Newt effect at the Iowa Faith & Coalition forum, “He began with the declaration that Americans were confronting the most important election choice since 1860. America would have the chance in 2012, Mr. Gingrich said, to repudiate decisively decades of leftward drift in our universities and colleges, our newsrooms, our judicial system and bureaucracies ... He would go on to detail the key policies he would put in place if elected, something other Republican candidates have done regularly to little effect. The Gingrich list was interrupted by thunderous applause at every turn.”
I would love to see Kentucky Sen. Rand PaulRand PaulGOP rep: Trump has 'extra-constitutional' view of presidency The ignored question: What does the future Republican Party look like? Rand Paul skeptical about Romney as secretary of State MORE (R) run in 2016, but a big country like America possibly must find a Bismarck to hold together, and what Paul wants will wait. That would be Newt. And if Hillary runs, Newt will run as well. It is in the nature of politics that every force will find its equal and opposite force: particle and wave, Newt and Hillary. And if Hillary enters, Newt will be president in 2016.
Newt wants the debates to run endlessly as they did last time. He will get his wish, and he will win them.
Our American condition is formed by TV. In McLuhanist terms, it is sensory/feeling. As we descend the stairs through TV, our definitive representatives become stand-up comics and actors, and our public advocates are Tina Fey and Jim Carey; our Mozarts are Cyndi Lauper, our Buddhas are Jim and Tammy Faye.
World dominium agencies like Bill Clinton’s “global initiative” — with Hillary his agent abroad — effect only a horde, and 850 million friends on Facebook mark the death of American individuation. It is what we have become. In time, small groups, possibly in Kentucky, West Virginia or Appalachia, where the fever runs high and the life force is primal, may demand something better, but not today.
Today it is Newt vs. the Clinton World Cartel.