THE HILL
 

Sarah Palin and Rick Perry should bring a Conservative Party challenge in 2012

By Bernie Quigley - 11/02/09 09:11 AM ET

Whatever happens tomorrow in the NY-23 race will be anticlimactic. Now that Dede Scozzafava, the Republican candidate, has dropped out, there has already been a clear and historic victory for the Conservative Party.

The Republican Party is now a third party in NY-23. The Conservative Party of New York was formed in 1962, but is the focus now of national interest. And it cannot be denied that Sarah Palin was the first major national political figure to cross the river to NY-23. The new energy heading to NY-23 is formed out of the Tea Party and Town Hall movements. We can possibly see now the fledgling beginning of a third major party in America, the Conservative Party.

South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford (R) was the first major figure to speak out when he wrote last Nov. 15 in The Wall Street Journal, “I find myself in a lonely position. While many states and local governments are lining up for a bailout from Congress, I went to Washington recently to oppose such bailouts. I may be the only governor to do so.” Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) joined him shortly after. But it cannot be denied that Palin is the dynamic force awakening the heartland to this new perspective. The victory of the Conservative Party over the Republican Party in NY-23 is the first step out of the abstract and into the concrete.

Maybe Perry should change his brand to Conservative Party in his race in Texas and leave Kay Bailey Hutchison to the Republican nostalgicos. Dick Cheney is campaigning for Hutchison, and they seem a fairly good match. Palin is stumping for Perry.

In our times there has not been such a critical division in substance and outlook. The critical turning in NY-23 came when Tim Pawlenty, the governor of Minnesota who expects to run for president in 2012, followed Palin’s initiative and threw his support to the Conservative Party candidate, Doug Hoffman. By the time Scozzafava dropped out, Palin, Pawlenty, Perry, former New York Gov. George Pataki, Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson and other prominent Republicans had lined up with them. Newt Gingrich led the traditionalists in support of Scozzafava. Cheney might be considered in the Gingrich column as well. Haley Barbour, governor of Mississippi and head of the Republican Governors Association, supports Perry in Texas and might be considered among the Conservatives.

With 43 percent of the voters in a poll not long ago claiming to be independent, it is fully possible today to see a third-party challenge in 2012. Palin would be the perfect candidate. Two issues need a fundamental new approach: The war and the bailouts. In my opinion the Republicans are dead wrong on the war and the Democrats are dead wrong on the bailouts. And there are two people on these fronts today who present better ideas: Ron Paul and Marine Capt. Matthew Hoh.

The Wall Street Journal reports that in a recent online poll at ronpaul.com, 93 percent of Texans said they think Ron Paul should run for president in 2012. Paul independents and conservatives could well find a place of convergence in the rising Conservative Party. As Daniel McCarthy, senior editor at The American Conservative wrote recently, Republicans have yet to comprehend the magnitude of their loss in recent years among young people. “If Republicans are to have any hope of turning back that tide, they must heed the man who excited more students and young people than any other candidate for the GOP nomination — Ron Paul.”

Political parties are exclusively about packaging. New ideas and ideals need new packages or they will be beaten back by senior generations demanding the old hat, the old calcified forms and the old orthodoxies. This is still fantasy football, but a Palin/Perry ticket representing the Conservative Party in 2012 would really wake things up.


Visit Mr. Quigley's website at http://quigleyblog.blogspot.com.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/campaign/65817-sarah-palin-and-rick-perry-should-bring-a-conservative-party-challenge-in-2012

Comments (16)

Perry has to beat that RINO Kay Bailey Hutchison first.BY Jimmy on 11/02/2009 at 11:28
The Repiblican party really turned it's back on the Ron Paul supporters. Its mainly the Republicans that throw all conservative values out the window to support religious or war mongering legislation. I have encountered many of them who become angry, irate, and irrational when presented with facts and true conservative values. I welcome a new party.BY jMunny on 11/02/2009 at 12:07
Perry is a flip flopping, inconsistent, debate with himself Democrat. No wait, he is a Republican. No wait, he is a conservative. No wait, an appeal to moderates "when I have to win" candidate. No wait…he is a brush my hair, take the Bailout, wait, no bailout. Oh I forgot about my burned down tax payer funded house. What an idiotic so called Republican. This guy chaired Al Gore's election campaign for President and calls himself a Republican??? Please!BY PERRY YOU LIE! on 11/02/2009 at 12:10
I agree that Ron Paul holds the answers, and Ron Paul supporters are looking beyond party to 'conservative candidates' where that isn't satisfied within the GOP. I don't know about Palin yet, didn't she get on board with the bailouts and didn't she support increasing military intervention in the middle east? I don't know enough details to have been able to make up my mind. However, Ron Paul spurred these issues coming to the forefront, and it is good to see other conservative voices taking them up.BY spinnikerca on 11/02/2009 at 13:21
For any combination of Palin/Paul/Perry to work as a 3rd party candidate there would have to be coalitions drawn between the regionally strong minor parties of similar persuasion, ie. the Libertarian, Constitution, Conservatives, Alaska Independence Parties etc.Not one of them has or will have the resources/ballot access to challenge in all 50 states, but if the Republican Primary Season yields strong results for both Paul and Palin, then after the Republicans destroy both of them in favor of Romney or whomever's turn it is next they can turn with confidence and broad support to the minor parties to get them the ballot access they need to challenge the status quo. I lot, and I mean, a lot, has to happen between now and then for this to be even a remotely viable plan of attack.Ta,BY Tom L on 11/02/2009 at 13:33
Ronald Reagan was also a Democrat at one point. So was everyone who was anyone in Texas. Bashing Perry for having once been a Democrat decades ago is stupid.BY John Spagliardo on 11/02/2009 at 14:53
Perry and Hutchison are both involved in the globalist (i.e., world government) Bilderberg Group. Debra Medina is the best gubernatorial choice for Texas conservatives!R on Paul 2012.BY Jon on 11/02/2009 at 15:13
Go for it. Both the R's and D's have outlived their usefulness. An alternative is desperately needed and no like what Steve Lonegan did in NJ over the weekend.BY George on 11/02/2009 at 16:47
Ron Paul and Sarah Palin joining forces in a Conservative Party? You have got to be kidding. This is probably the most nonsensical recipe for a conservative resurgence I have ever read. The populist social conservative poster child the most libertarian member of congress = FAIL PARTY.BY handsofaten on 11/02/2009 at 16:55
i think the most interesting people in the GOP are palin and paul.Both were attacked but had some very good ideas.I do believe that libertarians need to be brought into the GOP and if they were,young people would follow…the same old establishment republicans won't cut it.BY robedrt m. simon on 11/02/2009 at 18:08

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.