THE HILL
 

GOP rout looming

By A.B. Stoddard - 11/02/09 10:24 AM ET

Looks like the Democrats are facing a tough night tomorrow; they could lose both gubernatorial elections in New Jersey and Virginia and the special election in New York's 23rd district. While they will be able to credibly explain away each loss, those explanations will drown in the big story of a GOP rout and the foreboding the Democratic Party should feel about next year's midterm elections.

In Virginia, Democrat Creigh Deeds is now 14 points behind Bob McDonnell, according to the latest poll. He is sure to lose the state, which President Barack Obama won last year, the first time a Democrat took the commonwealth in a presidential election since 1964. Everyone thinks Virginia is purple, and the demographics have shifted dramatically in recent years — particularly in Northern Virginia — but the party in the White House has lost the gubernatorial election the first year in for three decades running. Most handicappers bet Deeds would take it if John McCain were president. President Obama happens to still be popular in Virginia, but Deeds — a rural Virginian — has not only failed to excite Democratic base voters in critical Northern Virginia, he has not made the necessary inroads in rural parts of the state that his recently successful fellow Democrats like Sen. Jim Webb, Sen. Mark Warner and Gov. Tim Kaine have. The White House decided this was gone two weeks ago and chose to leak pre-mortem assessments to The Washington Post about how Deeds never ran the campaign they recommended. Democrats can kiss Virginia goodbye.

In New Jersey, Obama remains popular as well, but the incumbent, Gov. Jon Corzine, is not. He is likely to lose if support for Independent candidate Chris Daggett continues to flow to Republican Chris Christie, as recent polling suggests. If Corzine holds on, it will be all because of Daggett, a result more of vote-splitting than a surge of Democratic votes, despite Obama's enormous campaign push to hold the Garden State, including pleas to get "cousin Pookie" off the couch to go and vote. Losing New Jersey will be very painful for Democrats, but it won't be a referendum on Obama; it will be an inevitable rejection of Corzine's failed leadership there over the last four years.

The chaotic, dramatic NY-23 race is now Doug Hoffman's to lose. The outsider, independent candidate has surged to first place now that liberal Republican nominee Dede Scozzafava dropped out. Democrats are hoping her endorsement of Bill Owens, the Democrat, will push him over the top, but it doesn't look likely. This has been Republican turf since 1870 and Hoffman is likely to keep it for the GOP. The consequences of his victory, however, would be far-reaching. The question for the Republican Party, of how to harness burgeoning, grassroots conservative anger, isn't easily answered. From the purging of moderates to the embrace of outside candidates, it may become harder for Republican incumbents to win and grow their margins next year and take back a majority. After all, the coalition that wins is not purer, only larger.


WHAT WOULD A GOP ROUT MEAN FOR DEMOCRATS? Ask A.B. returns tomorrow, Tuesday, Nov. 3. Please join my weekly video Q&A by sending your questions and comments to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Thank you.

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/campaign/65839-gop-rout-looming

Comments (4)

Excuse me, but a "GOP rout", even if one occurs, wouldn't mean squat.Corzine is damaged goods. Owens is running in a GOP district. Deeds insisted on running as a hayseed. Where is the Democratic beef???The fact that there's ANY question at all, in any of these races shows INCREDIBLE strength of the Democratic party. AND, let us not forget…Hoffman is not a running on the GOP ticket, regardless of how insane he is.The REAL shockers will be if the Dems win ANY of these fights. And if they do, each is a different note of the death knell of the GOP.Tomorrow may be an interesting night.BY Ethan Q on 11/02/2009 at 13:36
I like Ethan's spin. It doesn't make any sense but he's one heck of a spinner.BY Baloney GUy on 11/02/2009 at 14:16
Wow. Talk about lowering expectations! Ethan, is this the mantra for the next few days? I can't wait to watch Rachel Maddow spit and sputter through the evening tomorrow. You guys thought you had a mandate. Wrong. We didn't like Bush or McSame either. This country is center-right and the next couple of election cycles will correct the mess Bush and the mushy middle made trying to absorb the Democratic Party (that is now completely dominated by lunatics)BY greg on 11/02/2009 at 14:50
Ethan, it's a long standing political axiom that losing is never a sign of strength. There are no moral victories in losing. Period. When the Republicans lost a lot, everyone talked about how it was over for the Republicans. That conservatism was dead and gone forever. So, given that scenario as fact according to CNN, MSNBC, and the usual Democrat pom pom club, the very simple fact that Democrats are not winning landslides in every single election is not a death knell for the Republicans. It just that simple. It's a sign that the Democrats, in six months, have squandered a huge political advantage. Not little advantage, but HUGE. They were winning governorships they never had, had taken all federal branches, and regained most of the state legislatures they had lost. In six months, that is already being lost. Hanging to any of them will not be a death knell for the GOP, they have nothing to lose. Does that make sense to you? I'll put it this way, most people think the Super Bowl is the Colts to lose, Most do not think it's the Browns to lose. Wanna guess why? Now, if the Colts lost a couple of games along the way, and the Browns suddenly win two games, is it now the Browns' to lose? I don't think so. Right, now, the only team that has anything to lose at all are the Democrats. According to CNN and most media, the Republicans are in about as good a shape as the Browns. They shouldn't be winning ANYTHING right now because the most popular president in the history of the world has accused them of everything that he has failed to deliver. People should believe that. They should therefore be lynching Republicans in the streets and censuring their every word ( if you listen to Commie lovin Anita Dunn ). But, people aren't doing that. They apparently are voting the other right now. Wonder why that is?BY Moonage on 11/02/2009 at 15:56

Add Comment

Name (required)

E-Mail (will not be published) (required)

Your Comments

You need Flash Player 8 (or higher) and JavaScript enabled to view this content

Get latest news from The Hill direct to your inbox, RSS reader and mobile devices.